DOJ-OGR-00008976.jpg

573 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 573 KB
Summary

This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on February 24, 2022. The order approves the defendant's proposed redactions to court documents, finding they are necessary to protect juror anonymity and privacy. The court orders the parties to file the redacted briefs and other materials by February 25, 2022, and also states it will docket a motion from 'Juror 50'.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Named as the Defendant in the case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
ALISON J. NATHAN District Judge
The judge presiding over the case and author of this order.
Juror 50 Juror
Mentioned in the final sentence, stating that the Court will docket Juror 50's motion.
McCoy
Named in a case citation: United States v. McCoy et al.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Government Agency
The court issuing the order.
Press-Enter. Co. Company
Named in a case citation: Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty.
Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty. Government Agency
Named in a case citation: Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-02-11
The Court issued a previous order referenced in this document.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2022-02-24
The court order (Document 607) was filed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2022-02-25
The parties are ordered to docket redacted briefs, exhibits, and their January 13 letters by this date.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States of America Ghislaine Maxwell

Locations (3)

Location Context
The location of the United States District Court handling the case.
Abbreviation for the Western District of New York, mentioned in a case citation.
Abbreviation for Riverside County, mentioned in a case citation.

Relationships (2)

United States of America Legal Ghislaine Maxwell
The document lists the United States of America as the plaintiff and Ghislaine Maxwell as the Defendant in case 20-CR-330.
ALISON J. NATHAN Professional Ghislaine Maxwell
Alison J. Nathan is the District Judge presiding over the case in which Ghislaine Maxwell is the Defendant.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,517 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 607 Filed 02/24/22 Page 1 of 2
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 2/24/22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States of America,
-v-
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
20-CR-330 (AJN)
ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of the Defendant’s proposed redactions revised in response to this Court’s order. See Dkt. Nos. 605, 606.
The Court has reviewed the proposed redactions and concludes that they are in accordance with its prior orders. See Dkt. Nos. 596, 605. The narrowly tailored redactions further the important interests of helping ensure the integrity of any inquiry and maintaining juror anonymity and privacy. As the Court explained in its February 11 Order, these interests justify redaction of the questions the parties propose be asked at any hearing and specific factual information developed by the parties that has not been publicly reported in the press and that the parties propose be inquired about at any forthcoming hearing. Dkt. No. 596 at 4 (citing United States v. McCoy et al., No. 14 Cr. 6181 (EAW), Dkt. No. 312 (text order) (W.D.N.Y. May 26, 2017); id. Dkt. No. 329 at 38-39; Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty., 464 U.S. 501, 511-12 (1984)).
Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to docket the redacted briefs, accompanying exhibits, and their January 13 letters, by February 25, 2022. The Court will docket Juror 50’s motion.
1
DOJ-OGR-00008976

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document