DOJ-OGR-00013447.jpg

502 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 502 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on whether Rodgers, a pilot, ever saw females who appeared to be under the age of 18 or 19 on flights he piloted for Epstein between 1994 and 2004, and also after 2004. Rodgers denies seeing any such individuals and confirms his recollection that a woman referred to as "Jane" appeared to be at least 18 when he met her.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Rodgers Witness
The individual being cross-examined about flights piloted for Epstein.
Epstein
Mentioned as the person for whom Rodgers flew planes from '94 to 2004.
MS. COMEY Attorney
Makes an objection during the cross-examination.
THE COURT Judge
Responds to an objection, stating "Just a moment." and "Overruled."
Jane
An alias for a woman being discussed, whom Rodgers recalls meeting and who appeared to be at least 18.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting agency.

Timeline (3 events)

1994-2004
Rodgers piloted over a thousand flights for Epstein.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Rodgers in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Rodgers MS. COMEY THE COURT Unidentified Questioner
post-2004
Rodgers piloted many flights after 2004.

Relationships (2)

Rodgers professional Epstein
Rodgers flew "thousand-plus flights" for Epstein from 1994 to 2004.
Rodgers acquaintance Jane
Rodgers recalls meeting Jane and states that she appeared to be at least 18 years old at the time.

Key Quotes (3)

"So fair to say in the thousand-plus flights that you flew for Epstein from '94 to 2004, you never once saw any female on the plane who looked under the age of 18 or 19, right?"
Source
— Unidentified Questioner (Questioning Rodgers about the age of female passengers on Epstein's planes.)
DOJ-OGR-00013447.jpg
Quote #1
"And, in fact, in the many flights you piloted after 2004, you never once saw any female on the planes who looked under the age of 18 or 19, apart from the ones traveling with their family?"
Source
— Unidentified Questioner (Continuing the line of questioning about underage female passengers on flights after 2004.)
DOJ-OGR-00013447.jpg
Quote #2
"I think your recollection, isn't it, was that she appeared to you to be at least 18 years old when you met her?"
Source
— Unidentified Questioner (Questioning Rodgers about his memory of meeting a woman referred to as "Jane".)
DOJ-OGR-00013447.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,213 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 169 of 262 1880
LC8VMAX6 Rodgers - cross
1 traveling with their parents or a nanny, you didn't see any
2 females on the plane under the age of, say, 18 or 19?
3 A. No.
4 Q. So fair to say in the thousand-plus flights that you flew
5 for Epstein from '94 to 2004, you never once saw any female on
6 the plane who looked under the age of 18 or 19, right?
7 A. No.
8 Q. And, in fact, in the many flights you piloted after 2004,
9 you never once saw any female on the planes who looked under
10 the age of 18 or 19, apart from the ones traveling with their
11 family?
12 MS. COMEY: Objection, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Just a moment.
14 Overruled.
15 A. That's correct.
16 Q. Okay. And that includes, doesn't it, the woman that you
17 referred to or that we have been referring to as "Jane" in your
18 direct exam; correct?
19 A. Correct.
20 Q. And you do recall meeting Jane, right?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. I think your recollection, isn't it, was that she appeared
23 to you to be at least 18 years old when you met her?
24 A. It did.
25 Q. And it also includes the woman we've been talking about,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013447

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document