This document is a page from the summation (closing arguments) delivered by prosecutor Ms. Moe in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor argues that Maxwell enticed a minor victim referred to as 'Jane' to travel to New York via plane, using money, gifts, and school payments provided by Epstein as inducement. The text outlines the legal elements of the crime, asserting that Maxwell intended for Jane to engage in criminal sexual activity with Epstein, who was provided access to the underage girl for molestation rather than mentorship.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor/Speaker |
Delivering the summation/closing argument to the jury.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Accused of enticing Jane, intending for her to be sexually abused.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Underage girl (under 17) enticed to travel to New York for abuse.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Co-conspirator |
Provided money/gifts to Jane; sexually abused Jane.
|
| Juan Alessi | Witness |
His testimony corroborates Jane's travel.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Destination of travel; location where sexual abuse occurred; jurisdiction for criminal offense laws.
|
"That money wasn't free, and part of the cause was getting Jane on the plane with them to go to New York where she was sexually abused."Source
"That is inducement, that is enticement, that is coercion."Source
"Maxwell absolutely intended that Jane would be abused in New York."Source
"They weren't traveling for mentorship or scholarships... they were getting her to travel so that she could be molested and that's exactly what happened."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,728 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document