This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge sustains an objection to Exhibit 309 and grants a request by Ms. Moe for a sealed sidebar discussion regarding the cross-examination of an individual named Brian due to privacy concerns. Consequently, pages 1440 to 1443 of the transcript are noted as sealed.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on objections, and managing courtroom logistics.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Speaking on behalf of the defense, confirming they have no further issues.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (likely Prosecution) |
Requesting a sidebar regarding cross-examination and privacy concerns.
|
| Brian | Witness/Subject |
Subject of potential cross-examination involving a privacy interest.
|
| Court Reporter | Court Staff |
Mentioned by the judge regarding the physical tax of lengthy sealed proceedings.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm listed in the footer.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00018615'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number and reporter firm.
|
|
|
Location suggested by the judge for lengthy sealed proceedings.
|
"I'm sustaining that objection on 401/403 grounds."Source
"Your Honor, may we briefly be heard at sidebar about an issue relating to potential cross-examination of Brian that implicates a privacy interest?"Source
"I do have a request for lengthy sealed proceedings that we do them in the robing room because of the physical taxing on the court reporter."Source
"(Pages 1440 to 1443 SEALED)"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,276 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document