DOJ-OGR-00011544.jpg
611 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
611 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a discussion about the date of a specific message, believed to be from November 2004. An attorney, Ms. Moe, argues that surrounding dates on message pads, flight records, and the defendant's travel with Epstein during that time support this date. The testimony of a crime victim named Carolyn is also cited as evidence of an ongoing conspiracy, which the defendant has the burden to prove withdrawal from.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, questioning the date of a document.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, arguing for a specific date (November 2004) for a message based on surrounding evidence.
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as someone the defendant was traveling with during November 2004.
|
|
| Carolyn | Crime victim |
Mentioned as a crime victim whose testimony indicated an ongoing conspiracy.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, beginning to respond to the Court and Ms. Moe.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Relationships (1)
The document states that 'the defendant was still traveling with Epstein during this exact same time period' (November 2004).
Key Quotes (4)
"It's not dated November 2004; am I right?"Source
— THE COURT
(Questioning the date of a message being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00011544.jpg
Quote #1
"Yes, your Honor, all of the dates surrounding the message would be after November 1, 2004. The neighboring dates are November 13."Source
— MS. MOE
(Responding to the Court and providing evidence for dating the message to November 2004.)
DOJ-OGR-00011544.jpg
Quote #2
"In addition, as we noted in our brief, the defendant was still traveling with Epstein during this exact same time period."Source
— MS. MOE
(Providing additional context to support the argument that the conspiracy was ongoing in November 2004.)
DOJ-OGR-00011544.jpg
Quote #3
"We think that the message pads, the flight records, the fact that the testimony of a crime victim Carolyn was that the conspiracy was ongoing more than meets this burden."Source
— MS. MOE
(Summarizing the evidence that supports the claim of an ongoing conspiracy.)
DOJ-OGR-00011544.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,587 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 25 of 101
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
1 THE COURT: It's not dated November 2004; am I right?
2 It's on a page that has dates surrounding it of December,
3 November.
4 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor, all of the dates
5 surrounding the message would be after November 1, 2004. The
6 neighboring dates are November 13. There's a date in December.
7 And I think looking at the message pads as a whole, it tells us
8 they're dated essentially sequentially.
9 THE COURT: Is there any way to tell -- again, this is
10 very technical -- if it's October and November?
11 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I'd be happy to take a look at
12 physical book. I just have the sheet in front of me to see the
13 page before and after, if the Court would like to examine it.
14 Our view is the combination of the message itself and the
15 neighboring dates tell us it's November of 2004. In addition,
16 as we noted in our brief, the defendant was still traveling
17 with Epstein during this exact same time period. Again, it's
18 the defendant's burden to establish withdrawal from an ongoing
19 conspiracy, which they've not attempted to do, nor could they.
20 We think that the message pads, the flight records, the fact
21 that the testimony of a crime victim Carolyn was that the
22 conspiracy was ongoing more than meets this burden.
23 THE COURT: Okay.
24 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, if I could just respond to
25 that. I do pick up on what the Court is saying, and we agree
2 It's on a page that has dates surrounding it of December,
3 November.
4 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor, all of the dates
5 surrounding the message would be after November 1, 2004. The
6 neighboring dates are November 13. There's a date in December.
7 And I think looking at the message pads as a whole, it tells us
8 they're dated essentially sequentially.
9 THE COURT: Is there any way to tell -- again, this is
10 very technical -- if it's October and November?
11 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I'd be happy to take a look at
12 physical book. I just have the sheet in front of me to see the
13 page before and after, if the Court would like to examine it.
14 Our view is the combination of the message itself and the
15 neighboring dates tell us it's November of 2004. In addition,
16 as we noted in our brief, the defendant was still traveling
17 with Epstein during this exact same time period. Again, it's
18 the defendant's burden to establish withdrawal from an ongoing
19 conspiracy, which they've not attempted to do, nor could they.
20 We think that the message pads, the flight records, the fact
21 that the testimony of a crime victim Carolyn was that the
22 conspiracy was ongoing more than meets this burden.
23 THE COURT: Okay.
24 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, if I could just respond to
25 that. I do pick up on what the Court is saying, and we agree
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
*
*
*
(212) 805-0300
*
*
*
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011544
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document