DOJ-OGR-00013996.jpg
523 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
523 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion during a trial break. The judge instructs the attorneys (Pomerantz, Sternheim, Rohrbach, Everdell) to confer and narrow their disagreements regarding a witness's prior inconsistent statements. The judge states an intention to review these statements during the lunch break to help resolve the issues later that day.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Loftus | Subject of direct examination |
Mentioned in the header of the transcript: 'Loftus - direct'.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, directing the proceedings.
|
| MS. POMERANTZ | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, representing the government.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the Judge.
|
| THE WITNESS | Witness |
An unnamed individual who is excused from the courtroom.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, responding on behalf of the government.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, agreeing to confer on issues.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion between the judge and attorneys during a break in a trial, with the jury not present.
Courtroom
2022-08-10
Attorneys were instructed to confer to narrow issues of disagreement.
Relationships (4)
The Court directs the proceedings and Ms. Pomerantz, representing the government, responds to the Court's questions.
Ms. Sternheim addresses the Court as 'Judge' in a formal court setting.
Mr. Rohrbach responds to the Court's question on behalf of the government, addressing the Court as 'your Honor'.
Mr. Everdell responds to the Court's directive regarding conferring on legal issues.
Key Quotes (2)
"On the prior inconsistent statements, I'm going to spend my lunch looking through them, but I'm hoping there will be consultation and stipulation in narrowing so that we can really get down to where there is genuine disagreement after you've had some discussion."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge outlining the plan for the break to resolve issues with witness statements.)
DOJ-OGR-00013996.jpg
Quote #1
"We will try to confer, see if we can narrow the issues."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Responding to the judge's request for the parties to work on resolving disagreements.)
DOJ-OGR-00013996.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,243 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 137 of 246
LCGCmax4
Loftus - direct
2432
1
(Jury not present)
2
THE COURT: The witness may step down and out for the
3
break. Thank you.
4
Everyone may be seated. Are there matters to take up
5
before the break or just after the break?
6
MS. POMERANTZ: Not from the government.
7
MS. STERNHEIM: Not at this time, Judge.
8
THE COURT: Okay. You could step out, thank you.
9
THE WITNESS: Okay.
10
(Witness excused)
11
THE COURT: I just want to make sure we have clarity
12
on what needs to be resolved following the break.
13
On the prior inconsistent statements, I'm going to
14
spend my lunch looking through them, but I'm hoping there will
15
be consultation and stipulation in narrowing so that we can
16
really get down to where there is genuine disagreement after
17
you've had some discussion.
18
Is that everybody's understanding?
19
MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine with the government, your
20
Honor.
21
MR. EVERDELL: We will try to confer, see if we can
22
narrow the issues.
23
THE COURT: Okay. I don't know when you need
24
resolution of the un-narrowed issue, but my understanding is we
25
might hit that point today.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013996
LCGCmax4
Loftus - direct
2432
1
(Jury not present)
2
THE COURT: The witness may step down and out for the
3
break. Thank you.
4
Everyone may be seated. Are there matters to take up
5
before the break or just after the break?
6
MS. POMERANTZ: Not from the government.
7
MS. STERNHEIM: Not at this time, Judge.
8
THE COURT: Okay. You could step out, thank you.
9
THE WITNESS: Okay.
10
(Witness excused)
11
THE COURT: I just want to make sure we have clarity
12
on what needs to be resolved following the break.
13
On the prior inconsistent statements, I'm going to
14
spend my lunch looking through them, but I'm hoping there will
15
be consultation and stipulation in narrowing so that we can
16
really get down to where there is genuine disagreement after
17
you've had some discussion.
18
Is that everybody's understanding?
19
MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine with the government, your
20
Honor.
21
MR. EVERDELL: We will try to confer, see if we can
22
narrow the issues.
23
THE COURT: Okay. I don't know when you need
24
resolution of the un-narrowed issue, but my understanding is we
25
might hit that point today.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013996
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document