This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal debate over whether employee insurance records from Mar-a-Lago (Government Exhibit 824) can be admitted as business records. Mr. Rohrbach argues they are kept for business purposes, while Ms. Sternheim contends they contain inadmissible hearsay. The judge concludes that testimony is required to establish a proper foundation before ruling on their admissibility.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney (implied) |
Speaker in a court proceeding, arguing against certain documents being considered business records.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Presiding over the court proceeding, addressed by Ms. Sternheim.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (implied) |
Speaker in a court proceeding, arguing that certain documents from Mar-a-Lago are business records.
|
| Ms. Gill |
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as someone who could testify that Mar-a-Lago retains certain records.
|
|
| your Honor | Judge |
A formal address to the judge, used by Mr. Rohrbach.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mar-a-Lago | company |
Mentioned as an employer that retains records related to employee insurance applications and sends faxes.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location from which employee insurance records and faxes originate.
|
"I wasn't planning to ask Ms. Gill this, but I think she would say that Mar-a-Lago retains these records in case there is some kind of dispute involving the insurance company and its employees."Source
"But it still contains hearsay information, the source of which we do not know. It is not part of the business of Mar-a-Lago, even though it does have employees and may offer it insurance, the fact that it is kept in their files does not deem it a business record."Source
"I think I'll have to hear the testimony, the foundation for the business record to determine whether it's sufficient under the rule."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,505 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document