DOJ-OGR-00014928.jpg

585 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 585 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Dr. Rocchio, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Dr. Rocchio is questioned about an article and states that he disagrees with its conclusions. He specifically identifies a highlighted portion of the text as being incomplete.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Rocchio Witness
Mentioned in the header ("Rocchio - Direct") and addressed as "Dr. Rocchio". He is being questioned.
MS. POMERANTZ Attorney (implied)
She is asking the questions during the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio.
THE COURT Judge
A speaker in the transcript, providing direction on what text should be reviewed for the record.
Honor Judge
A title used by Ms. Pomerantz to address the judge ("your Honor").

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (1 events)

2025-01-15
Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding his opinion on a published article.
Courtroom (implied)
Dr. Rocchio MS. POMERANTZ THE COURT

Relationships (2)

MS. POMERANTZ Professional Dr. Rocchio
Ms. Pomerantz is conducting a direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, who is serving as a witness.
MS. POMERANTZ Professional THE COURT
Ms. Pomerantz addresses the court formally as "your Honor" and follows the court's instructions.

Key Quotes (3)

"I do not."
Source
— Dr. Rocchio (In response to the question: "Do you agree with all of the conclusions of this article?")
DOJ-OGR-00014928.jpg
Quote #1
"The sentence beginning with "Furthermore" and ending with "negatives.""
Source
— THE COURT (Clarifying for the record which specific text Dr. Rocchio is being asked to review.)
DOJ-OGR-00014928.jpg
Quote #2
"I think it's incomplete and I disagree with the conclusion."
Source
— Dr. Rocchio (His reaction to the highlighted text he was asked to review.)
DOJ-OGR-00014928.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,353 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 52 of 158 52
LBAGmax2
Rocchio - Direct
1 provided data supporting that this is a process that is well
2 known and well established in the literature, and then it
3 pointed to directions that were needed for future work. It
4 pointed to some of the concerns about definitions and things
5 that -- suggestions, basically, for issues that needed to be
6 addressed in future research.
7 Q. Do you agree with all of the conclusions of this article?
8 A. I do not.
9 Q. I want to direct your attention to Page 959. And I want to
10 zoom in on the paragraph above current definitions. It's about
11 four lines down. It starts with "Furthermore."
12 A. Okay.
13 MS. POMERANTZ: We can highlight those next two
14 sentences.
15 Q. Dr. Rocchio, could you review the highlighted text.
16 A. Okay.
17 MS. POMERANTZ: And for purposes of the record, your
18 Honor, I'm happy to read that.
19 THE COURT: The sentence beginning with "Furthermore"
20 and ending with "negatives."
21 MS. POMERANTZ: Thank you, your Honor.
22 BY MS. POMERANTZ:
23 Q. Dr. Rocchio, what is your reaction to this?
24 A. I think it's incomplete and I disagree with the conclusion.
25 Q. Can you explain?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014928

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document