HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011943.jpg
703 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
News article / legal report
File Size:
703 KB
Summary
A New York appeals court upheld Jeffrey Epstein's classification as a Level 3 sex offender, designating him a high risk to public safety. The court cited clear and convincing evidence of his behavior involving underage girls, despite the limited scope of his previous Florida conviction.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | ||
| Dareh Gregorian |
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| NY appeals court | ||
| state appeals court | ||
| state Appellate Division | ||
| House Oversight Committee |
Timeline (2 events)
Level 3 sex offender status upheld
Florida conviction for soliciting a minor
Relationships (2)
→
→
→
→
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (804 characters)
Jeffrey Epstein’s Level 3 sex offender status
upheld by NY appeals court
upheld by NY appeals court
By Dareh Gregorian
November 18, 2011 | 5:00am
Multimillionaire perv Jeffrey Epstein may not consider his Florida conviction for soliciting a
minor a big deal, but New York does.
minor a big deal, but New York does.
A state appeals court yesterday upheld the financier’s status as a Level 3 sex offender —
meaning he’s considered “a threat to public safety” and a “high risk” to offend again.
meaning he’s considered “a threat to public safety” and a “high risk” to offend again.
Epstein, 58, did 13 months in a Florida jail for soliciting a minor to perform a sex act on him
during a “massage.”
during a “massage.”
Although he was never indicted or convicted for hiring any other underage girls, the state
Appellate Division found there was “clear and convincing evidence” he had indeed done so,
making the Level 3 designation appropriate.
Appellate Division found there was “clear and convincing evidence” he had indeed done so,
making the Level 3 designation appropriate.
32
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011943
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document