DOJ-OGR-00017281.jpg
516 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
516 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge regarding how to instruct the jury about a document used for impeachment but not admitted into evidence. The parties debate the appropriate wording to avoid confusion while acknowledging the testimony related to the document.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. COMEY | Counsel/Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the judge ('Your Honor') about how to handle a document not in evidence.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Counsel/Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the judge ('Your Honor') and discussing impeachment from a document not i...
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Unknown |
Mentioned by MR. PAGLIUCA as being consistent with his line of argument.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the hearing and making suggestions on how to instruct on evidence.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion took place in court regarding how to handle a document that was used for impeachment but was not admitted into evidence.
Courtroom in the Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as part of the court reporting company's name, implying the location of the court proceedings.
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Comey addresses the Court as 'Your Honor' and presents a legal argument for the Court's consideration.
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the Court as 'Your Honor' and engages in a legal discussion about evidence.
Mr. Pagliuca mentions that Ms. Sternheim agrees with his legal position, indicating they are colleagues or collaborators on the case ('we're consistent').
Key Quotes (3)
"Your Honor, I believe a note saying that that document is not in evidence would be an appropriate response."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Proposing a way to address the jury about a document not in evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00017281.jpg
Quote #1
"I agree that the document is not in evidence. But there is 613 impeachment from that document."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Arguing that while the document isn't evidence, its use for impeachment has an effect that needs to be considered.)
DOJ-OGR-00017281.jpg
Quote #2
"How about "all admitted exhibits are before you.""Source
— THE COURT
(Suggesting alternative, neutral language for an instruction to the jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00017281.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,246 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 19 3094
LCLVMAXI
LCLVMAXI
1 Proposals for how to respond.
2 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe a note saying that
3 that document is not in evidence would be an appropriate
4 response.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I think since there was
6 impeachment from the document -- I agree it's not a deposition,
7 and I agree that the document is not in evidence. But there is
8 613 impeachment from that document. I think the Court -- and
9 Ms. Sternheim tells me what I was about to say, which is good;
10 we're consistent.
11 I think something like, you know, You have the
12 evidence and testimony relating to 3505-005. That's it. I
13 don't think that there should be any further discussion about
14 what is or is not in evidence.
15 THE COURT: How about "all admitted exhibits are
16 before you."
17 MS. COMEY: I think that's fine, your Honor.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: The problem, your Honor, is that
19 there's testimony about it.
20 THE COURT: You lost your mic.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: Sorry.
22 There's testimony about it.
23 THE COURT: It's true they've not asked for that
24 though.
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: They do have the transcript where it's
2 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe a note saying that
3 that document is not in evidence would be an appropriate
4 response.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I think since there was
6 impeachment from the document -- I agree it's not a deposition,
7 and I agree that the document is not in evidence. But there is
8 613 impeachment from that document. I think the Court -- and
9 Ms. Sternheim tells me what I was about to say, which is good;
10 we're consistent.
11 I think something like, you know, You have the
12 evidence and testimony relating to 3505-005. That's it. I
13 don't think that there should be any further discussion about
14 what is or is not in evidence.
15 THE COURT: How about "all admitted exhibits are
16 before you."
17 MS. COMEY: I think that's fine, your Honor.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: The problem, your Honor, is that
19 there's testimony about it.
20 THE COURT: You lost your mic.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: Sorry.
22 There's testimony about it.
23 THE COURT: It's true they've not asked for that
24 though.
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: They do have the transcript where it's
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017281
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document