DOJ-OGR-00008327.jpg
579 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
579 KB
Summary
This court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 10, 2021, documents a pretrial discussion. The judge rules on the process for determining the admissibility of testimony and orders the government to make a document exhibit available for defense inspection, after which the attorneys confirm the inspection already occurred on November 1st and that the original exhibit will be present at trial.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker making rulings on the admissibility of testimony and the availability of evidence for inspection.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker, likely representing the government, who confirms that an exhibit has been made available to the defense.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaker, likely representing the defense, who requests the original document be present at trial.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-12-10
A discussion between the judge and attorneys regarding the admissibility of testimony and the logistics of making a document exhibit available for inspection by the defense and for the trial.
courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where the trial will take place and the exhibit will be present.
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Moe addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and responds to the judge's questions and rulings in a formal court proceeding.
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and makes requests to the court.
They represent opposing sides (government and defense) in a legal proceeding, discussing the handling of evidence.
Key Quotes (2)
"I do think that the government needs to make it available for inspection to the defense, and so you'll work out the logistics of that pretrial."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge instructing the government on its obligation to provide evidence to the defense before trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00008327.jpg
Quote #1
"The actual exhibit will be here in the courtroom at trial. And we have already made that exhibit available for the defense for inspection. They have personally inspected it, I believe that was on November 1st."Source
— MS. MOE
(Responding to the judge and Mr. Pagliuca, confirming the exhibit's availability for trial and that the defense has already inspected it.)
DOJ-OGR-00008327.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,671 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 536 Filed 12/10/21 Page 17 of 43 17
LBNAMAXTps
LBNAMAXTps
1 THE COURT: So I will allow -- I don't know if it's
2 admissible. I think, from what I see, it's a close question.
3 It's going to turn on the testimony. So I'll allow that
4 testimony to take place. I'll allow voir dire. And then I'll
5 make a ruling, depending on how that goes, as to whether it
6 meets the threshold for admissibility, and the questions that
7 have been raised go to weight. But as I sit here, I don't know
8 until I hear that testimony.
9 I do think that the government needs to make it
10 available for inspection to the defense, and so you'll work out
11 the logistics of that pretrial. To the extent that they want a
12 forensic expert to look at it, a document forensic expert to
13 look at it, you'll work out the logistics to make it available.
14 OK?
15 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
16 THE COURT: Any questions about that?
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: No, your Honor, other than one of my
18 requests was that the actual document be here at trial and not
19 a photocopy of one page.
20 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. The actual exhibit will be
21 here in the courtroom at trial. And we have already made that
22 exhibit available for the defense for inspection. They have
23 personally inspected it, I believe that was on November 1st.
24 THE COURT: Great. I'm happy to hear that. And not
25 just the page but the whole book.
2 admissible. I think, from what I see, it's a close question.
3 It's going to turn on the testimony. So I'll allow that
4 testimony to take place. I'll allow voir dire. And then I'll
5 make a ruling, depending on how that goes, as to whether it
6 meets the threshold for admissibility, and the questions that
7 have been raised go to weight. But as I sit here, I don't know
8 until I hear that testimony.
9 I do think that the government needs to make it
10 available for inspection to the defense, and so you'll work out
11 the logistics of that pretrial. To the extent that they want a
12 forensic expert to look at it, a document forensic expert to
13 look at it, you'll work out the logistics to make it available.
14 OK?
15 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
16 THE COURT: Any questions about that?
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: No, your Honor, other than one of my
18 requests was that the actual document be here at trial and not
19 a photocopy of one page.
20 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. The actual exhibit will be
21 here in the courtroom at trial. And we have already made that
22 exhibit available for the defense for inspection. They have
23 personally inspected it, I believe that was on November 1st.
24 THE COURT: Great. I'm happy to hear that. And not
25 just the page but the whole book.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00008327
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document