DOJ-OGR-00017322.jpg
543 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
543 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between a judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger, regarding the legal standard for finding a defendant guilty of aiding in the transportation of a person named 'Jane'. The discussion specifically focuses on whether a flight to New Mexico must have had a 'significant or motivating purpose' for illegal sexual activity to meet the criteria for a conviction.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker in a court proceeding, being questioned by the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in a court proceeding, questioning Mr. Everdell and interacting with Ms. Menninger.
|
| Jane | Subject of legal discussion |
A person whose flight to New Mexico is being discussed in the context of transportation for illicit sexual activity.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in a court proceeding, interjecting to answer a question from the court.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A court hearing where the judge and attorneys discuss the legal specifics of a charge related to aiding transportation for illicit sexual activity.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the destination of a flight involving a person named Jane.
|
Relationships (2)
The document shows a formal courtroom interaction where THE COURT questions MR. EVERDELL about a legal matter.
The document shows a formal courtroom interaction where MS. MENNINGER addresses THE COURT as 'Your Honor' and answers a legal question.
Key Quotes (3)
"To be found guilty on this count, must the jury conclude that she aided in the transportation of Jane's flight to New Mexico?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge posing a direct question to clarify the legal standard for a guilty verdict on a specific count.)
DOJ-OGR-00017322.jpg
Quote #1
"It has to be a place for which the travel was a significant or motivating purpose for illegal sexual activity."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(An attorney's response to the judge's question, defining the necessary condition for the travel's purpose.)
DOJ-OGR-00017322.jpg
Quote #2
"So they have excluded out where they're hypothetically claiming that the flight to New Mexico was the place for which the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(An attorney explaining her interpretation of a hypothetical question, suggesting that the flight to New Mexico has been specifically excluded as the travel intended for sexual activity.)
DOJ-OGR-00017322.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,330 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 29 3135
LCRVMAXT
LCRVMAXT
1 MR. EVERDELL: Right?
2 The travel back to a place where she is presumably not
3 engaging in illicit sexual activity, that is not a significant
4 or motivating purpose for that travel.
5 THE COURT: You didn't answer my question.
6 MR. EVERDELL: Maybe I'm confused by the question,
7 your Honor.
8 THE COURT: To be found guilty on this count, must the
9 jury conclude that she aided in the transportation of Jane's
10 flight to New Mexico?
11 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I interject myself
12 into this conversation?
13 THE COURT: If you answer the question, I would value
14 it.
15 MS. MENNINGER: I will.
16 It has to be a place for which the travel was a
17 significant or motivating purpose for illegal sexual activity.
18 In this hypothetical that they've given in this
19 question, they have a comma in two places. The first place
20 they have a comma is after the return flight, comma, but not
21 the flight to New Mexico, where the intent was for Jane to
22 engage in sexual activity, comma. So they have excluded out
23 where they're hypothetically claiming that the flight to New
24 Mexico was the place for which the intent was for Jane to
25 engage in sexual activity.
2 The travel back to a place where she is presumably not
3 engaging in illicit sexual activity, that is not a significant
4 or motivating purpose for that travel.
5 THE COURT: You didn't answer my question.
6 MR. EVERDELL: Maybe I'm confused by the question,
7 your Honor.
8 THE COURT: To be found guilty on this count, must the
9 jury conclude that she aided in the transportation of Jane's
10 flight to New Mexico?
11 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I interject myself
12 into this conversation?
13 THE COURT: If you answer the question, I would value
14 it.
15 MS. MENNINGER: I will.
16 It has to be a place for which the travel was a
17 significant or motivating purpose for illegal sexual activity.
18 In this hypothetical that they've given in this
19 question, they have a comma in two places. The first place
20 they have a comma is after the return flight, comma, but not
21 the flight to New Mexico, where the intent was for Jane to
22 engage in sexual activity, comma. So they have excluded out
23 where they're hypothetically claiming that the flight to New
24 Mexico was the place for which the intent was for Jane to
25 engage in sexual activity.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017322
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document