DOJ-OGR-00018267.jpg
584 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
584 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between the court, Ms. Comey, and Ms. Sternheim. The main topic is the redaction of a warrant and video evidence to protect individual privacy before public release. Ms. Sternheim describes a video as depicting a 'domicile of debauchery,' a characterization with which the court agrees, leading to an agreement that a redacted version of the materials will be prepared for the public.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. COMEY |
A speaker in the court transcript, addressing the court as 'your Honor' and agreeing to prepare a redacted document.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the proceeding and interacting with Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM |
A speaker in the court transcript, addressing the court as 'Judge' and commenting on video and other exhibits.
|
|
| Parkinson |
Mentioned in the header of the transcript, possibly as the subject of the direct examination ('Parkinson - Direct').
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A court proceeding where the judge, Ms. Comey, and Ms. Sternheim discuss redacting evidence, including a warrant and a video, to protect privacy before public release.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (2)
Ms. Comey addresses the court as 'your Honor' and agrees to follow the court's instructions regarding document redaction.
Ms. Sternheim addresses the court as 'Judge' and provides her legal opinion on the nature of certain exhibits.
Key Quotes (3)
"The individual exhibits are not as glaring to me as the video was, and viewing it in the context of the public not being aware of it, it sends an impression that this was like a domicile of debauchery, and there were a few pictures that maybe should not have been in the public domain, but 39 minutes of it should have been."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Describing the content of video evidence and arguing for its redaction or withholding from the public.)
DOJ-OGR-00018267.jpg
Quote #1
"I completely agree."Source
— THE COURT
(Responding to Ms. Sternheim's assessment of the video evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018267.jpg
Quote #2
"That's fine, your Honor. We'll work on that."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Agreeing to the court's instruction to create a redacted public version of a document.)
DOJ-OGR-00018267.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,451 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 166 of 236
LC3KMAX6 Parkinson - Direct 1070
LC3KMAX6 Parkinson - Direct 1070
1 reason most of that can't be a public document. And what you
2 need to do, since narrow tailoring is required, is to make a
3 public version so you redacted it to exclude the reading of the
4 warrant. I don't see why a public version can't be made that
5 simply redacts the few instances in which individuals whose
6 privacy must be protected is redacted.
7 MS. COMEY: That's fine, your Honor. We'll work on
8 that.
9 THE COURT: Okay.
10 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge.
11 THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim, I'm happy to hear if
12 there's additional -- I had that note to raise here for
13 purposes of the video.
14 Do you have that for other exhibits?
15 MS. STERNHEIM: The individual exhibits are not as
16 glaring to me as the video was, and viewing it in the context
17 of the public not being aware of it, it sends an impression
18 that this was like a domicile of debauchery, and there were a
19 few pictures that maybe should not have been in the public
20 domain, but 39 minutes of it should have been.
21 THE COURT: I completely agree.
22 MS. COMEY: That's understood, your Honor. We
23 approached it this way to avoid having to pause and then turn
24 to the side and then go back, but completely understood. And
25 we will prepare a redacted version that can be released to the
2 need to do, since narrow tailoring is required, is to make a
3 public version so you redacted it to exclude the reading of the
4 warrant. I don't see why a public version can't be made that
5 simply redacts the few instances in which individuals whose
6 privacy must be protected is redacted.
7 MS. COMEY: That's fine, your Honor. We'll work on
8 that.
9 THE COURT: Okay.
10 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge.
11 THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim, I'm happy to hear if
12 there's additional -- I had that note to raise here for
13 purposes of the video.
14 Do you have that for other exhibits?
15 MS. STERNHEIM: The individual exhibits are not as
16 glaring to me as the video was, and viewing it in the context
17 of the public not being aware of it, it sends an impression
18 that this was like a domicile of debauchery, and there were a
19 few pictures that maybe should not have been in the public
20 domain, but 39 minutes of it should have been.
21 THE COURT: I completely agree.
22 MS. COMEY: That's understood, your Honor. We
23 approached it this way to avoid having to pause and then turn
24 to the side and then go back, but completely understood. And
25 we will prepare a redacted version that can be released to the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018267
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document