DOJ-OGR-00016467.jpg

611 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 611 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, concerning case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. An attorney, likely for the defense, requests anonymous protection for witnesses testifying on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, citing potential unwanted attention. The judge instructs the parties to confer on the issue and present their arguments, while the opposing counsel, Ms. Moe, states this is new information and requests time to confer and submit a briefing.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell
Mentioned as the person on whose behalf witnesses are testifying.
THE COURT Judge
A speaker in the transcript, referred to as 'your Honor', who gives instructions to the legal parties.
MR. EVERDELL Attorney (implied)
A speaker in the transcript who addresses the court regarding witness protection.
MS. MOE Attorney (implied)
A speaker in the transcript who responds to the court and Mr. Everdell's points.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
the government Government agency
Mentioned as having sought and received protections for their witnesses.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Identified as the court reporting service at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding a request for anonymous protection for witnesses testifying on behalf of Ms. Maxwell.
Courtroom (implied)

Relationships (2)

MR. EVERDELL Professional (Adversarial) MS. MOE
They are opposing counsel in a legal case. Ms. Moe refers to needing to 'confer with defense', implying she is on the opposing side of the defense team, which Mr. Everdell appears to represent.
MR. EVERDELL Professional (Attorney-Client, implied) Ms. Maxwell
Mr. Everdell is arguing for protections for witnesses testifying 'on behalf of Ms. Maxwell', suggesting he is part of her defense counsel.

Key Quotes (3)

"people who are testifying here might get a lot of unwanted attention, especially if they are testifying on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. And they would like to be able to do this, at least some of them, with some sort of anonymous protection."
Source
— Unknown (likely Mr. Everdell) (Explaining the rationale for requesting anonymous protection for witnesses.)
DOJ-OGR-00016467.jpg
Quote #1
"Here's what I want to say: You should confer. Identify specifically who you're talking about and the asserted reasons. You'll let me know if you come to agreement or disagree and, in either case, you'll put -- certainly if you disagree, you'll put forward your disagreement."
Source
— THE COURT (Instructing the legal parties on the procedure for handling the request for witness anonymity.)
DOJ-OGR-00016467.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, this is the first we're hearing of this. So I'm not aware of how many their witnesses are or what the issues are, but we'd be happy to confer with defense about that and submit briefing on it during the break over the next few days."
Source
— MS. MOE (Responding to the request for witness anonymity, stating it is new information and requesting time to prepare a response.)
DOJ-OGR-00016467.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,561 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 251 of 267 2279
LCAVMAX8
1 I think given the protections that the government has
2 sought for their witnesses and that they've received for their
3 witnesses, we all know that this case has gotten a lot of
4 attention and that people who are testifying here might get a
5 lot of unwanted attention, especially if they are testifying on
6 behalf of Ms. Maxwell. And they would like to be able to do
7 this, at least some of them, with some sort of anonymous
8 protection.
9 And, your Honor, there's, I think, one in particular
10 that maybe we can be heard at sidebar on, but --
11 THE COURT: Here's what I want to say: You should
12 confer. Identify specifically who you're talking about and the
13 asserted reasons. You'll let me know if you come to agreement
14 or disagree and, in either case, you'll put -- certainly if you
15 disagree, you'll put forward your disagreement. To the extent
16 you agree, you'll put forward the rationale and authoritative
17 support for the proposition.
18 MR. EVERDELL: Absolutely, your Honor.
19 THE COURT: So timing on that?
20 MS. MOE: Your Honor, this is the first we're hearing
21 of this. So I'm not aware of how many their witnesses are or
22 what the issues are, but we'd be happy to confer with defense
23 about that and submit briefing on it during the break over the
24 next few days. I think the amount of time we'll need to
25 examine and brief the issue depends on how many folks we're
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016467

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document