DOJ-OGR-00011639.jpg
585 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
585 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, an attorney, Ms. Moe, confirms to the judge that an item was made available for inspection by the defense, resolving that issue. The judge then directs the conversation to the next matter: the admissibility of co-conspirator statements for the upcoming trial.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Attorney (implied) |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court about making an item available for inspection.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, addressed as 'your Honor', and directing the conversation.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney (implied) |
Speaker in the transcript, responding to the court.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the defense | Legal team |
A party in the legal case that requested and conducted an inspection of an item.
|
| the government | Government agency |
A party in the legal case, advised by the court not to mention a certain item in its opening statement.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
Timeline (4 events)
The court discusses the admissibility of co-conspirator statements during the course of the trial.
November 1st
A conference was scheduled to take place on November 1st.
Ms. Moe's side
the defense
the week before November 1st
The defense personally inspected an item made available by Ms. Moe.
this summer
An item was made available for inspection by Ms. Moe's side.
Ms. Moe's side
the defense
Relationships (3)
Ms. Moe addresses the court as 'your Honor' and responds to its questions.
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the court as 'your Honor'.
They are opposing sides in a legal proceeding, discussing procedural matters like evidence inspection and admissibility.
Key Quotes (3)
"We made it available for inspection this summer. We notified the defense in a letter that it was available for inspection. The defense asked for an inspection the week before our conference on November 1st. I made it available for inspection that day. They personally inspected it."Source
— MS. MOE
(Confirming to the court that the defense was given the opportunity to inspect an item.)
DOJ-OGR-00011639.jpg
Quote #1
"I think, given the uncertainty as to admission, the government should not mention it in its opening."Source
— THE COURT
(Instructing the government on how to proceed with its opening statement regarding a piece of evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00011639.jpg
Quote #2
"So next is the admissibility of co-conspirator statements."Source
— THE COURT
(Moving the proceedings to the next topic of discussion.)
DOJ-OGR-00011639.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,720 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 43 18
LBNAMAXTps
LBNAMAXTps
1 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. We made it
2 available for inspection this summer. We notified the defense
3 in a letter that it was available for inspection. The defense
4 asked for an inspection the week before our conference on
5 November 1st. I made it available for inspection that day.
6 They personally inspected it. We're happy to continue to make
7 that available for inspection to the defense.
8 THE COURT: I'm very happy to hear that. Thank you.
9 I appreciate that. And I think that takes care of that for
10 now.
11 I guess one question: I think, given the uncertainty
12 as to admission, the government should not mention it in its
13 opening.
14 MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. Thank you.
15 THE COURT: Anything before we move on?
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: No, your Honor. Thank you.
17 THE COURT: So next is the admissibility of
18 co-conspirator statements. I do appreciate the efforts to come
19 to reasonable agreement, of course, with the defense preserving
20 objections as to ultimate admissibility. Based on the law, of
21 course the government has to make the showing that's required
22 during the course of the trial.
23 There are two statements that are exemplars that
24 remain in issue, and I think, starting with the second one
25 first: so the second one, it seems to me, is not being offered
2 available for inspection this summer. We notified the defense
3 in a letter that it was available for inspection. The defense
4 asked for an inspection the week before our conference on
5 November 1st. I made it available for inspection that day.
6 They personally inspected it. We're happy to continue to make
7 that available for inspection to the defense.
8 THE COURT: I'm very happy to hear that. Thank you.
9 I appreciate that. And I think that takes care of that for
10 now.
11 I guess one question: I think, given the uncertainty
12 as to admission, the government should not mention it in its
13 opening.
14 MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. Thank you.
15 THE COURT: Anything before we move on?
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: No, your Honor. Thank you.
17 THE COURT: So next is the admissibility of
18 co-conspirator statements. I do appreciate the efforts to come
19 to reasonable agreement, of course, with the defense preserving
20 objections as to ultimate admissibility. Based on the law, of
21 course the government has to make the showing that's required
22 during the course of the trial.
23 There are two statements that are exemplars that
24 remain in issue, and I think, starting with the second one
25 first: so the second one, it seems to me, is not being offered
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011639
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document