This document is a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Comey. The parties agree to conduct closing arguments on the upcoming Monday and discuss the appropriate length, with the judge suggesting two hours. Ms. Comey notes the preparation is still cumbersome due to exhibits that were intentionally reserved for the closing arguments.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (implied) |
A speaker in the court proceeding, discussing the scheduling and duration of closing arguments.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Presiding over the court proceeding, confirming juror availability and suggesting a two-hour closing argument.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney (implied, for the government) |
A speaker in the court proceeding, agreeing to the schedule and explaining the work involved in preparing for closing...
|
| Ms. Moe |
Mentioned by the Court as having previously estimated a closing argument duration of two to three hours.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | Government agency |
Mentioned by Ms. Sternheim as a party in the case, likely the prosecution, which would be motivated to complete closi...
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, indicating they are the court reporting service that created the document.
|
"I think the government would join me, in having us complete all of the closing arguments and the charge on Monday."Source
"I mean, length of trial, the complexity of the charges, this should be a two-hour closing."Source
"We did, I will note, streamline our case significantly, and there were a number of exhibits that were not published to the jury, and I think we were explicitly told, that's for closing, when we wanted to do it with witnesses."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,831 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document