DOJ-OGR-00016754.jpg

534 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 534 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing dated August 10, 2022, detailing a judge's rulings on objections to a court transcript. The rulings assess the consistency of a witness named Jane's testimony against her prior statements concerning the presence of Ms. Maxwell, a past hike, and an instance of abuse in New York. The judge sustains some objections and overrules others, providing brief justifications for the decisions.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Jane Witness
A witness whose testimony and prior statements are being evaluated for inconsistency.
Ms. Maxwell
A person whose presence at an event is a subject of Jane's testimony.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that produced the transcript.

Timeline (4 events)

2022-08-10
A series of rulings (sustained or overruled) on objections to specific lines of a court transcript.
Jane's testimony is being compared to her prior statements regarding Ms. Maxwell's presence, a hike, and abuse in New York.
An event mentioned in Jane's prior statement, which is deemed not inconsistent with her testimony.
An event mentioned in Jane's prior statement, which is deemed not inconsistent with her testimony.
New York

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in reference to a prior statement by Jane about abuse.

Relationships (1)

Jane Legal Ms. Maxwell
Jane's testimony concerns whether Ms. Maxwell was present at an unspecified event, indicating their connection is central to the legal proceedings.

Key Quotes (1)

"a group thing"
Source
— Jane (From Jane's prior statement describing (or clarifying the nature of) abuse in New York.)
DOJ-OGR-00016754.jpg
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,305 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 25 of 197 2566
LCFCmax1
1 inconsistent.
2 Transcript at 476, lines 14 through 16, sustained for
3 the same reasons as the last two.
4 Transcript at 476, line 17 through 19, sustained for
5 the same reasons.
6 Transcript at 477, sustained for the same reasons.
7 Transcript at 478, overruled.
8 Transcript at 479 to 80, overruled.
9 Transcript at 480, sustained. There is no
10 inconsistency, because Jane's answer that she doesn't remember
11 and her prior statement that she did not know whether
12 Ms. Maxwell was present, there is no inconsistency.
13 Transcript at 499, 507 to 508, I will overrule.
14 Transcript at 506 to 7, sustained. Jane admitted to
15 making the prior statement.
16 Transcript at 512 to 13, sustained. Jane's prior
17 statement that they hiked is not inconsistent with her
18 testimony. Also not material.
19 Transcript at 513, overruled.
20 Transcript at 514, overruled.
21 Transcript at 514 to 15, sustained. Jane's prior
22 statement about abuse in New York not being, quote, a group
23 thing, is not inconsistent with her testimony.
24 Transcript at 521 to 22, sustained. Jane agreed with
25 virtually all of the details of this event, except for the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016754

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document