DOJ-OGR-00008320.jpg
561 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
561 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2021, detailing a pre-trial hearing. The judge notes that the government failed to include a financial institution on a list of entities to be mentioned at trial. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, then raises a procedural issue, proposing that any impeachment or refreshing of a witness's recollection be handled electronically.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over a court hearing, speaking with attorneys about procedural matters for a trial.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney (implied) |
Speaking to the court, indicating she has no further issues to raise.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney (implied) |
Speaking to the court, raising a concern about the use of impeachment material during the upcoming trial.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as having failed to include a financial institution in a list of entities for the trial.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Identified as the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-12-10
A court hearing to discuss pre-trial procedural matters, including the government's failure to list a financial institution and the electronic use of impeachment materials.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (2)
Mr. Pagliuca, likely an attorney, is addressing the judge ('Your Honor') to discuss procedural matters for a trial.
Key Quotes (3)
"It sounds like the government failed to include a financial institution that will be mentioned during trial."Source
— THE COURT
(Commenting on the government's omission from a list of entities that was requested by the court.)
DOJ-OGR-00008320.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, I wanted to talk a little bit about use of impeachment material during trial."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Introducing a new procedural topic for discussion with the judge.)
DOJ-OGR-00008320.jpg
Quote #2
"what I am proposing is that if we are going to be either impeaching or refreshing recollection of a particular witness, that we be able to do it electronically."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Proposing a method for handling witness testimony and evidence during the trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00008320.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,413 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 536 Filed 12/10/21 Page 10 of 43 10
LBNAMAXTps
LBNAMAXTps
1 something, and this witness is technically, I believe, a
2 records custodian. He may be of a higher level than your
3 standard records custodian, but his testimony is sort of
4 ancillary to the charges in this indictment.
5 THE COURT: All right.
6 The purpose of me asking the parties to submit a list
7 of entities or addresses that may be mentioned during trial was
8 to capture this sort of issue. It sounds like the government
9 failed to include a financial institution that will be
10 mentioned during trial.
11 I agree. It's too late to go back and redo that,
12 having failed to do so. So I think if you think it's an issue,
13 it's a peremptory.
14 What else?
15 MS. COMEY: No other issues, your Honor, other than
16 the outstanding ones your Honor outlined.
17 THE COURT: OK. Any -- go ahead.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
19 Your Honor, I wanted to talk a little bit about use of
20 impeachment material during trial. I have a concern -- well,
21 what I am proposing is that if we are going to be either
22 impeaching or refreshing recollection of a particular witness,
23 that we be able to do it electronically. I think that that
24 would be fine, and that's typically how we would do this. The
25 problem with using impeachment material during the course of
2 records custodian. He may be of a higher level than your
3 standard records custodian, but his testimony is sort of
4 ancillary to the charges in this indictment.
5 THE COURT: All right.
6 The purpose of me asking the parties to submit a list
7 of entities or addresses that may be mentioned during trial was
8 to capture this sort of issue. It sounds like the government
9 failed to include a financial institution that will be
10 mentioned during trial.
11 I agree. It's too late to go back and redo that,
12 having failed to do so. So I think if you think it's an issue,
13 it's a peremptory.
14 What else?
15 MS. COMEY: No other issues, your Honor, other than
16 the outstanding ones your Honor outlined.
17 THE COURT: OK. Any -- go ahead.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
19 Your Honor, I wanted to talk a little bit about use of
20 impeachment material during trial. I have a concern -- well,
21 what I am proposing is that if we are going to be either
22 impeaching or refreshing recollection of a particular witness,
23 that we be able to do it electronically. I think that that
24 would be fine, and that's typically how we would do this. The
25 problem with using impeachment material during the course of
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00008320
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document