HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013174.jpg

1.85 MB

Extraction Summary

1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Academic text / scientific paper (legal discovery production)
File Size: 1.85 MB
Summary

This document is a single page (258) from a scientific textbook or academic paper discussing 'Neural Foundations of Learning,' specifically focusing on Hebbian Learning and synaptic connections. While the content is purely academic neuroscience, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013174' indicates this document was produced as part of a Congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's extensive funding of and connections to the scientific community (neuroscience/AI).

People (1)

Name Role Context
Donald Hebb Scientist/Author
Proposed the original Hebbian learning rule in 1949.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Indicated by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (1 events)

1949
Publication of Donald Hebb's book proposing the Hebbian learning rule.
Unknown

Key Quotes (2)

"The most common and plausible assumption about learning in the brain is that synaptic connections between neurons are adapted via some variant of Hebbian learning."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013174.jpg
Quote #1
"The new thing here, not foreseen by Donald Hebb, is the 'postsynaptic depression' involved in rule component 2."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013174.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,933 characters)

258
13 Local, Global and Glocal Knowledge Representation
13.5 Neural Foundations of Learning
Now we move from knowledge representation to learning – which is after all nothing but the adaptation of represented knowledge based on stimulus, reinforcement and spontaneous activity. While our focus in this chapter is on representation, it's not possible for us to make our points about glocal knowledge representation in neural net type systems without discussing some aspects of learning in these systems.
13.5.1 Hebbian Learning
The most common and plausible assumption about learning in the brain is that synaptic connections between neurons are adapted via some variant of Hebbian learning. The original Hebbian learning rule, proposed by Donald Hebb in his 1949 book [Heb49], was roughly
1. The weight of the synapse x -> y increases if x and y fire at roughly the same time
2. The weight of the synapse x -> y decreases if x fires at a certain time but y does not
Over the years since Hebb's original proposal, many neurobiologists have sought evidence that the brain actually uses such a method. One of the things they have found, so far, is a lot of evidence for the following learning rule [DC02, LS05]:
1. The weight of the synapse x -> y increases if x fires shortly before y does
2. The weight of the synapse x -> y decreases if x fires shortly after y does
The new thing here, not foreseen by Donald Hebb, is the "postsynaptic depression" involved in rule component 2.
Now, the simple rule stated above does not sum up all the research recently done on Hebbian-type learning mechanisms in the brain. The real biological story underlying these approximate rules is quite complex, involving many particulars to do with various neurotransmitters. Ill-understood details aside, however, there is an increasing body of evidence that not only does this sort of learning occur in the brain, but it leads to distributed experience-based neural modification: that is, one instance synaptic modification causes another instance of synaptic modification, which causes another, and so forth² [Bi01].
13.5.2 Virtual Synapses and Hebbian Learning Between Assemblies
Hebbian learning is conventionally formulated in terms of individual neurons, but, it can be extended naturally to assemblies via defining "virtual synapses" between assemblies.
Since assemblies are sets of neurons, one can view a synapse as linking two assemblies if it links two neurons, each of which is in one of the assemblies. One can then view two assemblies as being linked by a bundle of synapses. We can define the weight of the synaptic bundle from assembly A1 to assembly A2 as the number w so that (the change
² This has been observed in "model systems" consisting of neurons extracted from a brain and hooked together in a laboratory setting and monitored; measurement of such dynamics in vivo is obviously more difficult.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013174

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document