DOJ-OGR-00014472.jpg

604 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 604 KB
Summary

This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe in a criminal case. Ms. Moe argues that the defense has deliberately misled the jury by taking a witness's, Jane's, statements out of context. She provides two examples: one involving a question about orchestra music and another where the defense selectively quoted from a legal document, omitting a key sentence that states the defendant, Maxwell, facilitated and was present for Jane's sexual abuse.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Speaker (likely prosecutor/lawyer)
Mentioned in the header 'Summation - Ms. Moe', indicating she is giving the summation.
Jane Witness/Victim
A person whose testimony and abuse are being discussed. The defense is accused of trying to discredit her.
Epstein Abuser
Mentioned as someone involved in Jane's abuse.
Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned as the defendant who allegedly facilitated the sexual abuse of Jane and was frequently present during it.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-08-10
A summation being given by Ms. Moe in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Jane was questioned by the defense about an application and a legal document (an interrogatory) in an attempt to discredit her.
courtroom (implied)
Jane the defense
The sexual abuse of Jane, which Maxwell allegedly facilitated and was frequently present for.

Relationships (3)

Maxwell abuser-victim Jane
The document states, 'Maxwell facilitated the sexual abuse of Jane and was frequently present when the sexual abuse of Jane occurred.'
Epstein abuser-victim Jane
The document mentions that the defense suggested a legal document meant 'Jane said nobody else besides Epstein had been involved in her abuse.'
Maxwell co-conspirators Epstein
The document implies a connection as both are named in relation to Jane's abuse, with Maxwell facilitating the abuse that Epstein was also involved in.

Key Quotes (3)

"List two difficult works performed in orchestra, band, or an ensemble within the past year."
Source
— Application question (The actual question from an application that the defense used to try and discredit Jane.)
DOJ-OGR-00014472.jpg
Quote #1
"Nothing has been difficult for me."
Source
— Jane (Jane's answer to the application question, which the speaker argues was taken out of context by the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00014472.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell facilitated the sexual abuse of Jane and was frequently present when the sexual abuse of Jane occurred."
Source
— Ms. Moe (quoting a legal document) (A portion of a legal document that Ms. Moe claims the defense intentionally omitted when questioning Jane to create a misimpression.)
DOJ-OGR-00014472.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,493 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 72 of 257 2905
LCKVMAX4
Summation - Ms. Moe
1 nothing has been difficult for me; correct?
2 I guess I did.
3 But then you saw the actual application, the whole
4 thing.
5 What was that question really about? List two
6 difficult works performed in orchestra, band, or an ensemble
7 within the past year. And Jane answered: Nothing has been
8 difficult for me.
9 So what does that mean? The defense spent a long time
10 trying to discredit Jane with a line that was really about
11 orchestra music. Even Jane didn't realize she was being misled
12 this way until she was shown the question itself on redirect.
13 Here's another example: Remember how Jane was asked
14 about a legal document called an interrogatory? She told you
15 that she'd never seen this document before and she had no idea
16 what it was. And the defense suggested to you that this legal
17 document means that Jane said nobody else besides Epstein had
18 been involved in her abuse. There's this long question here.
19 But guess what: Here's the portion that the defendant
20 didn't show you and didn't read to you. It says, Maxwell
21 facilitated the sexual abuse of Jane and was frequently present
22 when the sexual abuse of Jane occurred. It's right there in
23 that same document. They didn't read that part to you;
24 instead, they plucked parts out of context to create a
25 misimpression.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014472

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document