EFTA00030069.pdf
70 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
70 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from March 9, 2021, regarding the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Laura Menninger submits a letter to Judge Nathan detailing objections to the government's proposed redactions in an Omnibus Response. Subsequent emails in the chain involve coordination between the defense and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding the exchange of proposed redactions.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Laura A. Menninger | Partner, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. |
Sender of the original email regarding objections to redactions.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the case (U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) and the person whose objections are being filed.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Addressee of the letter mentioned in the email body (Alison J. Nathan).
|
| Bobbi C Sternheim | Attorney |
Cc recipient on the email.
|
| Jeff Pagliuca | Attorney |
Cc recipient on the email.
|
| Christian R Everdell | Attorney |
Cc recipient on the email, affiliated with Cohen & Gresser LLP.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (prosecution), recipients/senders of emails.
|
|
| Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. |
Law firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger's firm).
|
|
| Cohen & Gresser LLP |
Law firm associated with Christian R Everdell.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
|
Relationships (1)
Menninger filing objections on behalf of Maxwell.
Key Quotes (2)
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,256 characters)
From: [Redacted] )" <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, [Redacted]
<[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] )" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] (USANYS)"
<[Redacted]>, "[Redacted])" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:56:11 +0000
Attachments: PROPOSED_REDACTIONS _
_2021.02.26_Government_Omnibus_Opposition_to_Maxwell_Defense_Motions_FINAL.pd
f
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, [Redacted]
<[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] )" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] (USANYS)"
<[Redacted]>, "[Redacted])" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:56:11 +0000
Attachments: PROPOSED_REDACTIONS _
_2021.02.26_Government_Omnibus_Opposition_to_Maxwell_Defense_Motions_FINAL.pd
f
Attached.
______________________________________________________________________
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 2:54 PM
To: [Redacted] ) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] ) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted]
) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response
______________________________________________________________________
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 2:54 PM
To: [Redacted] ) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] ) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted]
) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response
Thanks. When you can would you mind sending us our proposed redactions to pages 1-128?
From: [Redacted] ) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 2:01 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted]
) <[Redacted]>
Subject: FW: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 2:01 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted]
) <[Redacted]>
Subject: FW: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response
FYI
From: Laura Menninger
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 1:08 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] ) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] ) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted]
(USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] ) <[Redacted]>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM'
<[Redacted]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[Redacted]>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP
<[Redacted]>
Subject: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 1:08 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] ) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] ) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted]
(USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] ) <[Redacted]>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM'
<[Redacted]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[Redacted]>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP
<[Redacted]>
Subject: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response
Dear Judge Nathan –
Pursuant to Rule 2(B) of the Court’s individual rules, attached is a letter setting forth Ms. Maxwell’s objections to the
redactions proposed by the government to their Omnibus Response and Exhibit 5. Also attached are exhibits setting forth
Ms. Maxwell’s proposed redactions.
redactions proposed by the government to their Omnibus Response and Exhibit 5. Also attached are exhibits setting forth
Ms. Maxwell’s proposed redactions.
Best regards,
Laura A. Menninger
Laura A. Menninger
EFTA00030069
Laura A. Menninger | Partner
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
[Redacted] Denver, CO 80203
[Redacted]
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
[Redacted] Denver, CO 80203
[Redacted]
EFTA00030070
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document