DOJ-OGR-00010367.jpg

653 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 653 KB
Summary

This legal document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated April 29, 2022, concerning the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document, authored by Judge Alison J. Nathan, provides background on Maxwell's 2020 indictment for sex trafficking with Jeffrey Epstein, the subsequent thirteen-day trial, and the jury's guilty verdict on five of six counts. It introduces the defendant's post-trial motions, which argue for vacating some or all of her convictions.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
The defendant in the case, indicted for participation in a sex trafficking scheme with Jeffrey Epstein. She was found...
Jeffrey Epstein Longtime companion
Mentioned as Ghislaine Maxwell's longtime companion and co-conspirator in a scheme to entice, transport, and traffic ...
ALISON J. NATHAN Circuit Judge, sitting by designation
The judge presiding over the case and authoring the Opinion & Order.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK government agency
The court where the case is being heard and the document was filed.
United States of America government agency
The plaintiff in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
The Government government agency
Mentioned as the prosecuting party that presented evidence at trial. Refers to the United States of America.

Timeline (5 events)

1994-2004
Ghislaine Maxwell was charged with conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to violate federal statutes related to sexual abuse of minors.
2020
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell was indicted for her participation in a scheme to entice, transport, and traffic underage girls for sexual abuse.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
A thirteen-day trial was held where the Government presented extensive witness testimony and other evidence against Ghislaine Maxwell.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
The jury deliberated for over five days.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
jury
The jury returned a verdict of guilty on five of the six counts against Ghislaine Maxwell.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Locations (1)

Location Context
The jurisdiction of the United States District Court hearing the case.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell personal and criminal Jeffrey Epstein
The document describes Jeffrey Epstein as Ghislaine Maxwell's 'longtime companion' and states she was charged with conspiring with him in a sex trafficking scheme.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,786 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 657 Filed 04/29/22 Page 1 of 45
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 4/29/22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States of America,
-v-
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
20-CR-330 (AJN)
OPINION & ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation:
In 2020, the Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell was indicted for her participation in a scheme to entice, transport, and traffic underage girls for sexual abuse by and with Jeffrey Epstein, her longtime companion. The Government at trial presented extensive witness testimony from multiple victim witnesses and others, as well as corroborating documentary and physical evidence. The testimony and other trial evidence established the Defendant's role in grooming and recruiting underage girls and using the cover of massage to perpetrate sexual abuse.
Following the thirteen-day trial, the Court submitted to the jury the six counts in the Indictment. The jury deliberated for over five days and returned a verdict of guilty on five of the six counts. Two of these counts of conviction charged the Defendant with substantive violations of federal statutes that target sexual abuse of minors—the Mann Act as to Count Four and the Trafficking Victims Protection Act as to Count Six. The other three counts of conviction, Counts One, Three, and Five, charged the Defendant with conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to violate those same statutes from 1994 to 2004.
Before the Court are the Defendant's post-trial motions making four alternative arguments for vacating some or all of her five counts of conviction. First, the Defendant argues that judgment may be imposed on only one of the three conspiracy counts (i.e., Counts One,
DOJ-OGR-00010367

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document