DOJ-OGR-00014756.jpg
639 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
639 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court ruling from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 22, 2022. The judge overrules objections made by the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, regarding her role in isolating minor girls and participating in a recruitment scheme with Epstein. The ruling cites trial testimony from witnesses 'Annie' and 'Jane' and details the recruitment chain starting with the defendant recruiting 'Virginia', who then enlisted 'Carolyn', who recruited others.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as collaborating with the defendant to isolate and recruit minor girls for a scheme involving sexualized ma...
|
|
| Ms. Maxwell | defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the case, who made objections that were overruled. The document states she was involved...
|
| Annie | witness |
Provided testimony regarding a trip to New Mexico, which was used as evidence that the defendant and Epstein isolated...
|
| Jane | witness |
Provided testimony that she would spend time at the Palm Beach residence alone with Epstein and the defendant.
|
| Virginia | recruit |
Mentioned as the first person recruited by the defendant in the scheme.
|
| Carolyn | recruit |
Mentioned as being enlisted by Virginia to join the scheme, and who then recruited others.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Appears at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the destination of a trip testified to by Annie, used as evidence of isolating girls.
|
|
|
A location where Jane testified she would spend time alone with Epstein and the defendant.
|
Relationships (4)
The document states that trial evidence established they worked together to isolate girls and developed a scheme to recruit them.
The document states, "The evidence indicated the scheme started with the defendant's recruitment of Virginia."
The document states, "Virginia then enlisted Carolyn in addition to at least two other girls."
The document states, "Carolyn in turn recruited at least three friends, and those friends then brought more girls."
Key Quotes (1)
"constant stream of girls who recruited each other."Source
— Unknown (from an assertion in the case)
(This is part of an assertion that the defendant objected to, claiming she and Epstein developed a scheme that created this stream of girls.)
DOJ-OGR-00014756.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,604 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 9 of 101 9
M6SQmaxl
M6SQmaxl
1 to be blind, deaf and dumb, and to say nothing of Epstein's and
2 Ms. Maxwell's lives.
3 Paragraph 26, there's an objection to the
4 characterization concerning the defendant's identification and
5 isolation of minor girls as inconsistent with the trial
6 evidence. I overrule this objection for the same reasons as
7 articulated with respect to paragraph 22. In addition, the
8 trial evidence established that the defendant and Epstein
9 isolated girls by spending time with them alone away from their
10 families. For example, Annie's testimony regarding the trip to
11 New Mexico. Jane's testimony that she would spend time at the
12 Palm Beach residence alone with Epstein and the defendant.
13 Paragraphs 27 and 28 the defendant makes two
14 objections: First, to the assertion that the defendant and
15 Epstein developed a scheme that created a "constant stream of
16 girls who recruited each other." And, second, she objects to
17 the assertion that she encouraged minor girls to bring other
18 minor girls to provide Epstein with sexualized massages.
19 Again, based on the trial testimony and evidence, I
20 overrule the objection. It supported the information in these
21 paragraphs. The evidence indicated the scheme started with the
22 defendant's recruitment of Virginia. Virginia then enlisted
23 Carolyn in addition to at least two other girls. Carolyn in
24 turn recruited at least three friends, and those friends then
25 brought more girls.
2 Ms. Maxwell's lives.
3 Paragraph 26, there's an objection to the
4 characterization concerning the defendant's identification and
5 isolation of minor girls as inconsistent with the trial
6 evidence. I overrule this objection for the same reasons as
7 articulated with respect to paragraph 22. In addition, the
8 trial evidence established that the defendant and Epstein
9 isolated girls by spending time with them alone away from their
10 families. For example, Annie's testimony regarding the trip to
11 New Mexico. Jane's testimony that she would spend time at the
12 Palm Beach residence alone with Epstein and the defendant.
13 Paragraphs 27 and 28 the defendant makes two
14 objections: First, to the assertion that the defendant and
15 Epstein developed a scheme that created a "constant stream of
16 girls who recruited each other." And, second, she objects to
17 the assertion that she encouraged minor girls to bring other
18 minor girls to provide Epstein with sexualized massages.
19 Again, based on the trial testimony and evidence, I
20 overrule the objection. It supported the information in these
21 paragraphs. The evidence indicated the scheme started with the
22 defendant's recruitment of Virginia. Virginia then enlisted
23 Carolyn in addition to at least two other girls. Carolyn in
24 turn recruited at least three friends, and those friends then
25 brought more girls.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014756
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014756
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document