HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015878.jpg

1.47 MB

Extraction Summary

1
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book page / manuscript / evidence production
File Size: 1.47 MB
Summary

This document appears to be page 188 of a book or manuscript titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text discusses mathematical concepts regarding large numbers, the uncertainty principle, and randomness, citing mathematician George Chaitin. It specifically discusses the compressibility of numbers and references the genetic sequence of smallpox (17733173332032037377) stored at the Pasteur Institute and the CDC.

People (1)

Name Role Context
George Chaitin American Mathematician
Mentioned in the text for his explanation that a random number is uncompressible.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Pasteur Institute
Location in France where the full genetic sequence of smallpox is stored.
CDC
Centers for Disease Control (Atlanta); location where the full genetic sequence of smallpox is stored.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', indicating this document was part of a congressional investigation pro...

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of the Pasteur Institute.
Location of the CDC.

Key Quotes (4)

"In my view, any model of the Universe that ignores them is likely to be wrong."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015878.jpg
Quote #1
"What a human means by random is a jumbled up number: one with varying digits that have no real pattern."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015878.jpg
Quote #2
"Some numbers are Hamlet; some numbers are pi."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015878.jpg
Quote #3
"One interesting number is the following: 17733173332032037377. It is the genetic sequence for the virus smallpox..."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015878.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,124 characters)

188 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?
I know you’re looking for the difference but you won’t find one, as I did not have time to write the numbers out in full. The 10^20000th digit is different, but even if I took the whole age of the universe and counted as fast as possible I would not reach this digit. Any number greater than, 10^120/10^-43 digits cannot be distinguished from another in the age of the observable universe. Real numbers are in practice subject to an uncertainty principle. Some mathematicians even wonder whether they really exist. But, they do exist in our minds and our thought experiments. In my view, any model of the Universe that ignores them is likely to be wrong.
Random Numbers
Which of the following numbers is random?
1111111111111111
34289460370124001
49293741762343083
THINK ABOUT YOUR ANSWER THEN READ ON
Each of the numbers could be random. There is no reason any set of 10 digits is more likely than another, but it feels very unlikely that if I tried to generate a random number I would get 15 consecutive digits. What a human means by random is a jumbled up number: one with varying digits that have no real pattern. An American mathematician, George Chaitin has been able to explain this by saying that a random number is uncompressible. This means there is no way to describe the number more efficiently than writing it out in full. A string of ones can be compressed. “Write a million 1s” takes only 18 characters, yet accurately describes a number that is a million digits long. By contrast 8988376132 can’t be compressed very much at all, its information is just a jumble. There are many interesting numbers around. Some numbers are Hamlet; some numbers are pi. One interesting number is the following: 17733173332032037377. It is the genetic sequence for the virus smallpox, or at least the first 20 digits. Copies of the full sequence sit under lock and key in the Pasteur Institute in France and the CDC in Atlanta. This number is a candidate for an ‘evil’ number. You might think there are many numbers that could represent smallpox because there are
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015878

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document