DOJ-OGR-00018353.jpg
595 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
595 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022. It captures a conversation between the judge, Mr. Rohrbach, and Mr. Everdell about a stipulation regarding the testimony of a witness, Sergeant Michael Dawson. The parties agreed to read the stipulation to the jury to avoid the inconvenience of the witness having to travel back from Florida to provide additional testimony.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
A speaker in the court transcript who states "No objection" to the proposed stipulation.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge in the proceeding, who facilitates the discussion about the stipulation.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
A speaker in the court transcript who explains the reasoning for the stipulation and suggests how to present it to th...
|
| Sergeant Michael Dawson | Sergeant / Witness |
The witness whose additional testimony is the subject of the stipulation, to avoid him having to travel back from Flo...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion was held between the judge and attorneys regarding a stipulation for a witness's additional testimony.
Courtroom (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location from which the witness, Sergeant Michael Dawson, would have to travel.
|
Relationships (3)
Both are attorneys participating in the same court proceeding, representing opposing parties ('defense' and 'government') who have agreed on a stipulation.
The judge (THE COURT) is presiding over the case and directly addresses Mr. Everdell to clarify the details of the stipulation.
The judge (THE COURT) is presiding over the case in which Mr. Rohrbach is participating as an attorney.
Key Quotes (2)
"Actually, we offered, Judge, because we didn't want him to have to travel back from Florida, but yes, that's how it worked."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Explaining to the judge the reason for agreeing to a stipulation for Sergeant Michael Dawson's testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00018353.jpg
Quote #1
"The government can weigh in, but I would simply tell them that the parties have reached a stipulation about some additional testimony that the last witness you heard from, Sergeant Michael Dawson, would have given on the stand."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Proposing to the judge what to tell the jury regarding the stipulation.)
DOJ-OGR-00018353.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,786 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 261 1156
LC6Cmax1
LC6Cmax1
1 the defense could read that stipulation before the calling of
2 the next witness.
3 MR. ROHRBACH: No objection.
4 THE COURT: And just by background, I imagine you had
5 just one or two questions left and the government said rather
6 than having him come back, would you stipulate to testimony,
7 you agreed, and that's the stipulation?
8 MR. EVERDELL: Actually, we offered, Judge, because we
9 didn't want him to have to travel back from Florida, but yes,
10 that's how it worked.
11 THE COURT: I appreciate both sides doing that. As
12 you see, when I tell the jury we'll end at 5:00, we end at
13 5:00, but sometimes that produces issues. Obviously let me
14 know if we're one or two questions away, but I appreciate the
15 parties working together to aid that.
16 So the suggestion is the jury comes out, I tell them
17 that -- what would you like me to tell them, Mr. Everdell?
18 MR. EVERDELL: The government can weigh in, but I
19 would simply tell them that the parties have reached a
20 stipulation about some additional testimony that the last
21 witness you heard from, Sergeant Michael Dawson, would have
22 given on the stand. For matters of convenience, we didn't want
23 to call him back. So the parties have agreed to read in a
24 stipulation about his additional testimony.
25 THE COURT: And then the defense could read the stip?
2 the next witness.
3 MR. ROHRBACH: No objection.
4 THE COURT: And just by background, I imagine you had
5 just one or two questions left and the government said rather
6 than having him come back, would you stipulate to testimony,
7 you agreed, and that's the stipulation?
8 MR. EVERDELL: Actually, we offered, Judge, because we
9 didn't want him to have to travel back from Florida, but yes,
10 that's how it worked.
11 THE COURT: I appreciate both sides doing that. As
12 you see, when I tell the jury we'll end at 5:00, we end at
13 5:00, but sometimes that produces issues. Obviously let me
14 know if we're one or two questions away, but I appreciate the
15 parties working together to aid that.
16 So the suggestion is the jury comes out, I tell them
17 that -- what would you like me to tell them, Mr. Everdell?
18 MR. EVERDELL: The government can weigh in, but I
19 would simply tell them that the parties have reached a
20 stipulation about some additional testimony that the last
21 witness you heard from, Sergeant Michael Dawson, would have
22 given on the stand. For matters of convenience, we didn't want
23 to call him back. So the parties have agreed to read in a
24 stipulation about his additional testimony.
25 THE COURT: And then the defense could read the stip?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018353
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document