This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge clarifies a procedural matter with counsel, Ms. Moe, regarding which parts of evidence marked as 'identification 52' are being entered into the record. After a brief recess, the judge confirms with both Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger that they are ready to proceed and directs that the jury be brought in.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the case, clarifying evidence, and directing the proceedings.
|
| MS. MOE | Counsel |
Speaker in the transcript, responding to the judge's questions and statements.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Counsel |
Speaker in the transcript, responding to the judge's question about bringing in the jury.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as the party that was not moving evidence '52 in its entirety'.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
"I've looked at the transcript, and the government expressly said it wasn't moving 52 in its entirety."Source
"We have our jury. Any reason not to bring them in, counsel?"Source
"Please bring in the jury."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,203 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document