DOJ-OGR-00016226.jpg

440 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 440 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge clarifies a procedural matter with counsel, Ms. Moe, regarding which parts of evidence marked as 'identification 52' are being entered into the record. After a brief recess, the judge confirms with both Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger that they are ready to proceed and directs that the jury be brought in.

People (3)

Name Role Context
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the case, clarifying evidence, and directing the proceedings.
MS. MOE Counsel
Speaker in the transcript, responding to the judge's questions and statements.
MS. MENNINGER Counsel
Speaker in the transcript, responding to the judge's question about bringing in the jury.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
government government agency
Mentioned as the party that was not moving evidence '52 in its entirety'.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion in open court regarding the status of evidence marked as identification 52.
Courtroom
The court took a recess before bringing in the jury.
Courtroom
The judge instructs for the jury to be brought in.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."

Relationships (2)

THE COURT professional MS. MOE
Ms. Moe addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and responds to the judge's legal and procedural statements, indicating a judge-counsel relationship in a courtroom setting.
THE COURT professional MS. MENNINGER
Ms. Menninger addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and responds to the judge's question, indicating a judge-counsel relationship.

Key Quotes (3)

"I've looked at the transcript, and the government expressly said it wasn't moving 52 in its entirety."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge is clarifying which parts of evidence marked as '52' are being entered into the record.)
DOJ-OGR-00016226.jpg
Quote #1
"We have our jury. Any reason not to bring them in, counsel?"
Source
— THE COURT (After a recess, the judge is preparing to resume the trial with the jury present.)
DOJ-OGR-00016226.jpg
Quote #2
"Please bring in the jury."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge's final instruction on the page, directing the trial to proceed.)
DOJ-OGR-00016226.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,203 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 10 of 267 2038
LCACmax1
1 (In open court)
2 THE COURT: I've looked at the transcript, and the
3 government expressly said it wasn't moving 52 in its entirety.
4 So that's what's in issue and that's what I reserved on. So
5 it's the subletters. Then 52, what's been marked for
6 identification as 52 should be part of the record for purposes
7 of the 901 issue. Okay?
8 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
9 THE COURT: But what's been moved are the sub-sheet
10 copies.
11 If nothing else, I'll step down until we have our
12 jury.
13 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: Thank you.
15 (Recess)
16 THE COURT: We have our jury. Any reason not to bring
17 them in, counsel?
18 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you.
19 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. Thank you.
20 THE COURT: Please bring in the jury.
21 (Continued on next page)
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016226

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document