DOJ-OGR-00016972.jpg

514 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 514 KB
Summary

This court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on August 10, 2022, documents a discussion between attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Mr. Rohrbach) and the judge to finalize jury instructions. The parties agree to several edits, including replacing the term 'a Minor' with 'an Individual Under the Age of 18' to conform to the statute, and substituting the generic term 'the defendant' with the specific name 'Ms. Maxwell'.

People (4)

Name Role Context
MR. EVERDELL Attorney (implied)
A speaker in the transcript discussing jury instructions with the court.
THE COURT Judge
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the discussion and making rulings on jury instructions.
Mr. Rohrbach Attorney (implied)
A speaker in the transcript who states he has 'No objection' to a proposed change.
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned as the defendant whose name will replace the term 'the defendant' in the jury instructions.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion between the judge and attorneys to finalize the wording of jury instructions. Specific edits include changing 'a Minor' to 'an Individual Under the Age of 18' in instructions 24-29, and replacing 'the defendant' with 'Ms. Maxwell' on page 35, line 13.
Courtroom (implied)

Relationships (3)

Ms. Maxwell Legal THE COURT
Ms. Maxwell is identified as 'the defendant' in a case being presided over by THE COURT.
MR. EVERDELL Professional THE COURT
Mr. Everdell, an attorney, addresses the judge as 'your Honor' while discussing and agreeing upon legal language for jury instructions.
Mr. Rohrbach Professional THE COURT
Mr. Rohrbach, an attorney, addresses the judge as 'your Honor' while participating in the discussion about jury instructions.

Key Quotes (3)

"it would have to be sex trafficking of an individual under the age of 18."
Source
— MR. EVERDELL (Explaining the rationale for changing the wording in jury instructions to align with the statute.)
DOJ-OGR-00016972.jpg
Quote #1
"So for all of those, we'll take out "a Minor" and replace with "an Individual Under the Age of 18.""
Source
— THE COURT (Issuing a ruling to amend jury instructions 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29.)
DOJ-OGR-00016972.jpg
Quote #2
"At line 13, replace "the defendant" with "Ms. Maxwell.""
Source
— MR. EVERDELL (Proposing an edit to page 35 of the jury instructions.)
DOJ-OGR-00016972.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,710 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 46 of 95 2784
LCI1MAX1
1 MR. EVERDELL: So this one, because the statute is 18,
2 it would have to be sex trafficking of an individual under the
3 age of 18.
4 THE COURT: I agree with that.
5 Mr. Rohrbach?
6 MR. ROHRBACH: No objection, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Okay. So go ahead. You want to call them
8 off, the instruction numbers for that, Mr. Everdell?
9 MR. EVERDELL: Sure, your Honor. That is Instruction
10 Nos. -- just a minute -- 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29.
11 THE COURT: Okay. So for all of those, we'll take out
12 "a Minor" and replace with "an Individual Under the Age of 18."
13 MR. EVERDELL: Right.
14 THE COURT: Next page.
15 MR. EVERDELL: Okay. So we just dealt with page 32,
16 which is the addition of the word "solely" on line 10?
17 THE COURT: Yes.
18 MR. EVERDELL: All right. Then on page 35, small
19 edit. At line 13, replace "the defendant" with "Ms. Maxwell."
20 THE COURT: Okay. Page 35, line 13, replacing "the
21 defendant" with "Ms. Maxwell."
22 MR. EVERDELL: Yeah.
23 THE COURT: Okay.
24 MR. EVERDELL: Okay. Yes. And just for clarity's
25 sake, your Honor, we're not replacing every instance of the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016972

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document