This document is a court transcript from a case filed on March 11, 2022. It captures a discussion between the court, Ms. Sternheim, and Mr. Everdell regarding a prior interview with an unnamed male subject. The conversation centers on clarifying what was said during that interview, particularly the subject's reaction to personal questions, and the court ultimately rules that the subject's motivation for speaking to the press after a trial is not relevant to the current matter.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Unknown, likely counsel |
Speaker in the court transcript, questioning and making statements to the court.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Unknown, likely counsel |
Speaker in the court transcript, making a brief statement.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, speaking and making rulings.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting agency.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as a place where a person would be sitting.
|
|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
"I recall being asking about friend and family, and she said "it also asked about you," he turned beet red, and she said: You're turning beet red. He said: The blood is rushing to my head."Source
"She actually said: You're not on the stand. You misquoted it in the papers."Source
"You're not in the sun, she said, you're not on the stand, don't worry, but yes."Source
"Those questions, what motivated him after trial, is not relevant to what was going on during the filling"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,472 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document