DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
585 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
0
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
585 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, is a portion of a court filing that details the responses of 'Juror No. 50' to a pre-trial questionnaire. The juror affirmed under penalty of perjury their ability to decide the case based solely on evidence, stated they had never been a victim of a crime, and had no views on relevant laws that would impede their ability to be fair and impartial regarding the allegations against Ms. Maxwell.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Potential Juror |
The subject of the document, whose questionnaire answers regarding their ability to be impartial are detailed.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant (implied) |
Mentioned in the context of allegations against her, which Juror No. 50 was questioned about.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Juror No. 50 completed a juror questionnaire under penalty of perjury, answering questions about their ability to serve fairly and impartially.
Relationships (1)
The document details Juror No. 50's sworn statements that they could be fair and impartial regarding the allegations against Ms. Maxwell.
Key Quotes (5)
"Yes,” Juror No. 50 could decide the case solely based on the evidence or lack of evidence and not based on bias, sympathy, or prejudice."Source
— Juror No. 50
(Response to Question 13 of the juror questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
Quote #1
"No,” Juror No. 50 had never been the victim of a crime."Source
— Juror No. 50
(Response to Question 25 of the juror questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
Quote #2
"No,” there was nothing about the nature of the allegations against Ms. Maxwell that “might make it difficult” for Juror No. 50 to be fair and impartial."Source
— Juror No. 50
(Response to Question 42 of the juror questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
Quote #3
"No,” Juror No. 50 did not have any views about laws concerning the age of consent that would affect his ability to be fair and impartial."Source
— Juror No. 50
(Response to Question 43 of the juror questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
Quote #4
"No,” Juror No. 50 did not have any views about the laws governing sex trafficking and sex crimes against minors that would affect his ability to be fair and impartial."Source
— Juror No. 50
(Response to Question 44 of the juror questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,531 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 12 of 66
If a potential juror selected either “yes” option, the questionnaire asked individuals
to explain their answer in writing, to state whether having been a victim of sexual assault,
sexual abuse, or sexual harassment would affect their ability to serve fairly and
impartially, and if so, to explain why.
to explain their answer in writing, to state whether having been a victim of sexual assault,
sexual abuse, or sexual harassment would affect their ability to serve fairly and
impartially, and if so, to explain why.
Finally, Question 50 asked potential jurors if there was any experience that they
had that might affect their ability to serve fairly and impartial as a juror.
had that might affect their ability to serve fairly and impartial as a juror.
Six-hundred and ninety-four individuals answered the questionnaire.
B. Juror No. 50’s questionnaire
Juror No. 50’s questionnaire is attached as EXHIBIT 1. Under the penalty of
perjury, Juror. No. 50 answered these questions as follows:
perjury, Juror. No. 50 answered these questions as follows:
* Question 13: “Yes,” Juror No. 50 could decide the case solely based on the
evidence or lack of evidence and not based on bias, sympathy, or prejudice.
evidence or lack of evidence and not based on bias, sympathy, or prejudice.
* Question 25: “No,” Juror No. 50 had never been the victim of a crime.
* Question 42: “No,” there was nothing about the nature of the allegations
against Ms. Maxwell that “might make it difficult” for Juror No. 50 to be
fair and impartial.
against Ms. Maxwell that “might make it difficult” for Juror No. 50 to be
fair and impartial.
* Question 43: “No,” Juror No. 50 did not have any views about laws
concerning the age of consent that would affect his ability to be fair and
impartial.
concerning the age of consent that would affect his ability to be fair and
impartial.
* Question 44: “No,” Juror No. 50 did not have any views about the laws
governing sex trafficking and sex crimes against minors that would affect
his ability to be fair and impartial.
governing sex trafficking and sex crimes against minors that would affect
his ability to be fair and impartial.
5
DOJ-OGR-00009013
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document