This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to refresh the witness's memory regarding prior statements made under oath in 2009 and her answers to interrogatories, but the witness expresses confusion. Another attorney, Ms. Comey, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, and the court sustains her objections.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
The witness being cross-examined, referred to as "THE WITNESS" and by her first name "Carolyn".
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
The attorney conducting the cross-examination of the witness, Carolyn.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
An attorney present at the proceeding who makes objections to Mr. Pagliuca's questions.
|
| Mr. Scarola |
Mentioned in a question as someone who directed the witness regarding answers to interrogatories.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge, who sustains objections made by Ms. Comey. Referred to as "your Honor" by Ms. Comey.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
"I am confused."Source
"Objection, your Honor. I didn't think that was what -- the witness said she didn't recall."Source
"Isn't it true that's what you said under oath in 2009?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,210 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document