DOJ-OGR-00018791.jpg

502 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 502 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to refresh the witness's memory regarding prior statements made under oath in 2009 and her answers to interrogatories, but the witness expresses confusion. Another attorney, Ms. Comey, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, and the court sustains her objections.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Carolyn Witness
The witness being cross-examined, referred to as "THE WITNESS" and by her first name "Carolyn".
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
The attorney conducting the cross-examination of the witness, Carolyn.
MS. COMEY Attorney
An attorney present at the proceeding who makes objections to Mr. Pagliuca's questions.
Mr. Scarola
Mentioned in a question as someone who directed the witness regarding answers to interrogatories.
THE COURT Judge
The presiding judge, who sustains objections made by Ms. Comey. Referred to as "your Honor" by Ms. Comey.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (3 events)

2009
The witness, Carolyn, gave a statement under oath.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca, with objections from Ms. Comey sustained by the court.
The witness, Carolyn, was shown answers to interrogatories and was directed by Mr. Scarola.

Relationships (3)

MR. PAGLIUCA professional Carolyn
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney cross-examining Carolyn, who is a witness in a legal proceeding.
MS. COMEY professional Carolyn
Ms. Comey is an attorney who is objecting to questions posed to the witness, Carolyn, suggesting a protective or adversarial role in the context of the questioning.
Mr. Scarola professional Carolyn
Mr. Pagliuca's question suggests Mr. Scarola directed Carolyn regarding her answers to legal interrogatories at some point in the past.

Key Quotes (3)

"I am confused."
Source
— THE WITNESS (The witness's initial response at the beginning of the testimony excerpt.)
DOJ-OGR-00018791.jpg
Quote #1
"Objection, your Honor. I didn't think that was what -- the witness said she didn't recall."
Source
— MS. COMEY (Ms. Comey objecting to Mr. Pagliuca's question about the witness's prior statements.)
DOJ-OGR-00018791.jpg
Quote #2
"Isn't it true that's what you said under oath in 2009?"
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (A question posed to the witness about her testimony from a previous year.)
DOJ-OGR-00018791.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,210 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 193 of 264 1634
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 THE WITNESS: I am confused.
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: It is.
3 THE WITNESS: Very confused right now.
4 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:
5 Q. Well, reviewing those questions and answers, does that
6 refresh your recollection --
7 A. You want me to read from 8 and 9 to 20 and 20-what?
8 Q. Deposition page 12, on that page.
9 A. Okay.
10 Q. Lines 18 through 25.
11 A. 18 through 25. Like I said, I'm so confused.
12 Okay. I read it.
13 Q. Does that refresh your recollection that you were shown
14 your answers to interrogatories, Mr. Scarola directed you to
15 them, and that you said to Mr. Scarola, this is what me and you
16 did, right, then it should be correct, unless somebody messed
17 with it?
18 MS. COMEY: Objection, your Honor. I didn't think
19 that was what -- the witness said she didn't recall.
20 THE COURT: Sustained.
21 Q. Isn't it true that's what you said under oath in 2009?
22 MS. COMEY: A same objection.
23 THE COURT: Sustained.
24 Q. I'd like to show you, Carolyn, the answers to
25 interrogatories that you authored and swore to under oath in
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018791

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document