DOJ-OGR-00017699.jpg

518 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 518 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. An attorney questions Jane about incidents in New York involving Ghislaine Maxwell, and despite objections from another attorney, Jane confirms that she did tell the government about at least one such incident.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Jane Witness
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined.
Ghislaine
Mentioned in a question regarding incidents in New York where she was present.
Maxwell
Mentioned as the subject of a paragraph and in questions about her presence at incidents in New York. Likely refers t...
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the proceedings, making rulings on objections.
MS. MENNINGER Attorney
Speaking to the court, likely the attorney conducting the cross-examination.
MS. MOE Attorney
Making objections to the court during the questioning.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
government government agency
Mentioned in a question about what the witness told them.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Cross-examination of a witness named Jane regarding her recollection of incidents in New York involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The witness confirms telling the government about at least one incident.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the location of incidents involving Ghislaine/Maxwell.

Relationships (4)

MS. MENNINGER professional Jane
Ms. Menninger is an attorney questioning Jane, who is a witness in a court proceeding.
MS. MOE professional Jane
Ms. Moe is an attorney objecting to questions being asked of the witness, Jane.
THE COURT professional MS. MENNINGER
The Court is the presiding judge, interacting with Ms. Menninger, an attorney in the case.
THE COURT professional MS. MOE
The Court is the presiding judge, ruling on objections made by Ms. Moe, an attorney in the case.

Key Quotes (3)

"Did you tell the government you recalled at least one incident in New York where Maxwell was present?"
Source
— Q (Questioner) (A question posed to the witness during cross-examination.)
DOJ-OGR-00017699.jpg
Quote #1
"Yes."
Source
— A (Witness) (The witness's affirmative response to being asked if she told the government about an incident in New York with Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00017699.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, again, I'd object to mischaracterizing these documents. It's very confusing for the"
Source
— MS. MOE (An objection made by an attorney during the questioning of the witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00017699.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,367 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 90 of 264 501
LC1VMAX3
Jane - cross
1 Q. On page 2. 3509-03, page 2.
2 A. What is the question?
3 Q. Do you recall -- does this refresh your recollection about
4 how many incidents in New York you recall with Ghislaine
5 present?
6 A. I don't think I have the correct page.
7 THE COURT: You're directing to the second full
8 paragraph, second sentence?
9 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor, the second full
10 paragraph on page 2. The paragraph begins with "Maxwell." The
11 second sentence of that paragraph.
12 MS. MOE: I also object as mischaracterizing.
13 THE COURT: Sustained.
14 Q. Did you tell the government that you recall one incident in
15 New York where Maxwell was present?
16 MS. MOE: Same objection, your Honor.
17 THE COURT: Sustained.
18 A. Well, this one says --
19 THE COURT: Just a second. Go ahead.
20 Q. Did you tell the government you recalled at least one
21 incident in New York where Maxwell was present?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And that's what you relayed to them on that day; correct?
24 MS. MOE: Your Honor, again, I'd object to
25 mischaracterizing these documents. It's very confusing for the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017699

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document