This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's (Ms. Moe) summation in a criminal trial against a defendant named Maxwell. The prosecutor argues that Maxwell was complicit in crimes with an associate named Epstein, citing her living arrangements in Palm Beach, her knowledge of his preferences, and the millions of dollars she received from him. The prosecutor introduces the legal theory of 'aiding and abetting' as a basis for the jury to find Maxwell guilty on specific counts.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Unknown, likely prosecutor |
Mentioned in the header as the person giving the summation.
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the summation, referred to as the defendant. The text details her actions and relationship with Epstein.
|
| Epstein | Associate of Maxwell |
Mentioned as someone Maxwell lived with, who liked certain massage oils, and who paid Maxwell millions of dollars.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge who will provide detailed instructions about the law to the jury.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location of a house where Maxwell slept in a specific bedroom.
|
"She knew, she was complicit, she is guilty."Source
"Ladies and gentlemen, that's eight reasons why you know the defendant is guilty."Source
"What Judge Nathan says about the law controls here."Source
"For counts Two, Four, and Six, which we're going to discuss in just a moment, Maxwell is guilty if she committed those crimes herself, but you can also find her guilty under an aiding and abetting theory."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,605 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document