DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif

46.7 KB

Extraction Summary

7
People
0
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document / court filing (memorandum of law)
File Size: 46.7 KB
Summary

This legal document, a Memorandum of Law, discusses the denial of a protective order sought by plaintiffs in a case (9:08-cv-80119-KAM). The motion aimed to prevent a named party, Epstein, from attending depositions and to exclude him from all depositions of the plaintiffs. The court finds that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate "extraordinary circumstances" and that the motion does not meet the necessary burden for Jane Does 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Epstein Defendant/Party in interest
Plaintiffs' motion seeks to exclude Epstein from all depositions.
Jane Does 2 Plaintiff
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 2.
Jane Does 3 Plaintiff
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 3.
Jane Does 5 Plaintiff
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 5.
Jane Does 6 Plaintiff
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 6.
Jane Does 7 Plaintiff
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 7.
Jane Doe 4 Plaintiff?
The motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4.

Timeline (3 events)

2009-09-11
Document 296 entered on FLSD Docket.
FLSD Docket
2009-09-17
Document 305-3 entered on FLSD Docket.
FLSD Docket
Plaintiffs' motion to deny a protective order, which seeks to exclude Epstein from depositions, is being discussed.
Court proceedings
Plaintiffs Epstein

Relationships (2)

Epstein Adversarial (legal proceeding) Plaintiffs
Plaintiffs' motion seeks to exclude Epstein from depositions.
Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 Same group/Plaintiffs Plaintiffs
affidavits regarding Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7

Key Quotes (4)

"Plaintiffs' motion is required to be denied as they have failed to meet their burden showing the "extraordinary circumstances" necessary to establish good cause to support a protective order which would grant the extraordinarily rare relief of preventing a named party from attending in person the deposition of another named party."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif
Quote #1
"Also requiring denial of Plaintiffs' motion is the fact that it seeks to exclude Epstein from all the depositions of all the Plaintiffs in actions before this Court."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif
Quote #2
"Such relief is unprecedented and attempts to have this Court look at the Plaintiffs' collectively as opposed to analyzing each case based on facts versus broad speculation whether "extraordinary circumstances" exist on a case by case basis."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif
Quote #3
"The motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4, or Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, or 7."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,262 characters)

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 305-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 Page 8 of 11
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 296 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2009 Page 8 of 33
Page 8
also prepared affidavits regarding Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, which are attached to DE
247.
Memorandum Of Law
20. Plaintiffs' motion is required to be denied as they have failed to meet their burden
showing the "extraordinary circumstances" necessary to establish good cause to support a
protective order which would grant the extraordinarily rare relief of preventing a named party
from attending in person the deposition of another named party. Also requiring denial of
Plaintiffs' motion is the fact that it seeks to exclude Epstein from all the depositions of all the
Plaintiffs in actions before this Court. Such relief is unprecedented and attempts to have this
Court look at the Plaintiffs' collectively as opposed to analyzing each case based on facts versus
broad speculation whether "extraordinary circumstances" exist on a case by case basis. In other
words, the standard is such that the Court would be required to determine whether each Plaintiff
has met her burden, should the Court consider adopting such extraordinary relief. On its face,
the motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4, or Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, or 7.
Discussion of Law Requiring the Denial of the Requested Protective Order
Rule 26(c)(1)(E), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2009), governing protective orders, provides in relevant
part that:
(1) In General. A party or any person from whom discovery is sought may move for
a protective order in the court where the action is pending--or as an alternative on
matters relating to a deposition, in the court for the district where the deposition will
be taken. The motion must include a certification that the movant has in good faith
conferred or attempted to confer with other affected parties in an effort to resolve the
dispute without court action. The court may, for good cause, issue an order to
protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or
undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following:
*
*
*
*
(E) designating the persons who may be present while the discovery is conducted;
03956-11001
DOJ-OGR-00030289

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document