This legal document, a Memorandum of Law, discusses the denial of a protective order sought by plaintiffs in a case (9:08-cv-80119-KAM). The motion aimed to prevent a named party, Epstein, from attending depositions and to exclude him from all depositions of the plaintiffs. The court finds that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate "extraordinary circumstances" and that the motion does not meet the necessary burden for Jane Does 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | Defendant/Party in interest |
Plaintiffs' motion seeks to exclude Epstein from all depositions.
|
| Jane Does 2 | Plaintiff |
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 2.
|
| Jane Does 3 | Plaintiff |
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 3.
|
| Jane Does 5 | Plaintiff |
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 5.
|
| Jane Does 6 | Plaintiff |
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 6.
|
| Jane Does 7 | Plaintiff |
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 7.
|
| Jane Doe 4 | Plaintiff? |
The motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4.
|
"Plaintiffs' motion is required to be denied as they have failed to meet their burden showing the "extraordinary circumstances" necessary to establish good cause to support a protective order which would grant the extraordinarily rare relief of preventing a named party from attending in person the deposition of another named party."Source
"Also requiring denial of Plaintiffs' motion is the fact that it seeks to exclude Epstein from all the depositions of all the Plaintiffs in actions before this Court."Source
"Such relief is unprecedented and attempts to have this Court look at the Plaintiffs' collectively as opposed to analyzing each case based on facts versus broad speculation whether "extraordinary circumstances" exist on a case by case basis."Source
"The motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4, or Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, or 7."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,262 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document