This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorneys Ms. Sternheim and Mr. Pagliuca discuss procedural matters with the Judge, including objections to the relevance of upcoming witness testimony and the estimated duration (1-1.5 hours) of Mr. Pagliuca's cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The transcript captures the logistical coordination to ensure the jury is not left waiting.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Acknowledging the court's statement at the beginning of the page.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the trial, managing procedural discussions.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Raising procedural issues regarding witness order and relevance objections.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Estimating time required for cross-examination.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header 'Carolyn - cross', implying she is the witness subject to cross-examination.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Implied by footer 'DOJ-OGR'
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced by Ms. Sternheim regarding calling witnesses.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the court reporter entity.
|
"I have some objection to the relevance of some of the testimony."Source
"I'm going to guess an hour, hour and a half, your Honor, something like that."Source
"Some of that may depend on some issues that I think the government has opened the door on."Source
"I don't want the jury to be sitting idly."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,363 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document