DOJ-OGR-00018809.jpg

470 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 470 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a procedural discussion between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The judge sustains a series of objections from Mr. Pagliuca related to specific numbered paragraphs (57, 63, 69, 75, 81, 87, 93) of testimony or evidence.

People (3)

Name Role Context
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
Speaking to the court during a cross-examination, referencing numbered paragraphs for objections.
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the case, ruling on objections, and instructing Mr. Pagliuca on how to proceed with making the record.
Carolyn Witness
Mentioned in the header as the person undergoing cross-examination ("Carolyn - cross").

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A dialogue between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the court regarding objections during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The court sustains objections related to paragraphs 57, 63, 69, 75, 81, 87, and 93.
Courtroom in the Southern District

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."

Relationships (2)

MR. PAGLIUCA Professional THE COURT
The document shows a formal interaction between an attorney (Mr. Pagliuca) and a judge (The Court) in a courtroom setting, discussing legal procedure and rulings.
MR. PAGLIUCA Adversarial / Professional Carolyn
The document header indicates Mr. Pagliuca is conducting a cross-examination of Carolyn, which is an adversarial process within a legal proceeding.

Key Quotes (2)

"If they are all on that same theory, then you can make the record. If there's any different theory of inconsistency, either as to the specific time frame and testimony or to some different inference available, I'll hear it."
Source
— THE COURT (Instructing Mr. Pagliuca on how to proceed with his objections to the numbered paragraphs.)
DOJ-OGR-00018809.jpg
Quote #1
"Sure. And when I get to the place where it's different, I'll stop and we'll address that."
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Agreeing to the court's instructions on handling objections.)
DOJ-OGR-00018809.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,093 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 211 of 264
LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross
1 I'll sustain on 57 for the same reason.
2 Next.
3 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think I can -- I can just tell you
4 all of them, your Honor, which are going to be the same.
5 THE COURT: If they are all on that same theory, then
6 you can make the record. If there's any different theory of
7 inconsistency, either as to the specific time frame and
8 testimony or to some different inference available, I'll hear
9 it. But otherwise just make the record with respect to the
10 numbered paragraphs.
11 MR. PAGLIUCA: Sure. And when I get to the place
12 where it's different, I'll stop and we'll address that.
13 THE COURT: Okay.
14 MR. PAGLIUCA: Is that fair?
15 THE COURT: Fair.
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: 63.
17 THE COURT: Okay. Sustained.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: 69, 75.
19 THE COURT: Sustained on 69. And sustained on 75.
20 MR. PAGLIUCA: 81.
21 THE COURT: Sustained.
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: 87.
23 THE COURT: Sustained.
24 MR. PAGLIUCA: 93.
25 THE COURT: Sustained.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018809

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document