This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a procedural discussion between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The judge sustains a series of objections from Mr. Pagliuca related to specific numbered paragraphs (57, 63, 69, 75, 81, 87, 93) of testimony or evidence.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaking to the court during a cross-examination, referencing numbered paragraphs for objections.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case, ruling on objections, and instructing Mr. Pagliuca on how to proceed with making the record.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the person undergoing cross-examination ("Carolyn - cross").
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
"If they are all on that same theory, then you can make the record. If there's any different theory of inconsistency, either as to the specific time frame and testimony or to some different inference available, I'll hear it."Source
"Sure. And when I get to the place where it's different, I'll stop and we'll address that."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,093 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document