DOJ-OGR-00016969.jpg
546 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
546 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge, government attorney Mr. Rohrbach, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell. The parties discuss whether to send an indictment back to the jury due to a wording issue concerning a minor. Both the prosecution and defense unexpectedly agree that this is unnecessary, a rare occurrence that the judge remarks upon.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Represents the government's position, stating they are not seeking to send the indictment back to the jury.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Defense Attorney |
Represents the defense's position, stating they would not like the indictment sent back to the jury.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, asking for the parties' positions and commenting on their agreement.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| The Government | government agency |
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as the party he represents, which is not seeking to send the indictment back.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding a procedural issue with the wording of an indictment, specifically whether it should be sent back to the jury.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (1)
They are opposing counsel in a legal case (government vs. defense) but find themselves in agreement on the procedural issue of not sending the indictment back to the jury.
Key Quotes (4)
"The government is not seeking to send the indictment back, your Honor."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Stating the government's official position on the procedural question raised.)
DOJ-OGR-00016969.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, the defense would not like that to happen."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Stating the defense's position, which aligns with the government's on this issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00016969.jpg
Quote #2
"You're in vigorous agreement."Source
— THE COURT
(Observing the unusual consensus between the prosecution and the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00016969.jpg
Quote #3
"Oh, I thought we were disagreeing. That's so rare. Yes, we're in agreement with that."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(A lighthearted response acknowledging the rarity of agreeing with the opposing counsel.)
DOJ-OGR-00016969.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,275 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 43 of 95
LCI1MAX1
LCI1MAX1
of a minor to engage in, so I think we need to change the
titles for Count Four, and I can get you the pages in a second,
but "transportation of an individual under 18 to engage in
illegal sexual activity."
titles for Count Four, and I can get you the pages in a second,
but "transportation of an individual under 18 to engage in
illegal sexual activity."
MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine, your Honor, but this
actually raises a related question, which is just whether the
Court sends the indictment back with the jury, since I think
the indictment has the same issue. It describes some of the
offenses in their captions as "of a minor."
actually raises a related question, which is just whether the
Court sends the indictment back with the jury, since I think
the indictment has the same issue. It describes some of the
offenses in their captions as "of a minor."
THE COURT: Well, what are the parties' positions on
that?
that?
MR. ROHRBACH: The government is not seeking to send
the indictment back, your Honor.
the indictment back, your Honor.
MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.
THE COURT: Yes.
MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, the defense would not like
that to happen. We think that the instructions advise the jury
about what they need to know about the law.
that to happen. We think that the instructions advise the jury
about what they need to know about the law.
THE COURT: You're saying you don't want to send the
indictment back.
indictment back.
MR. EVERDELL: Right.
THE COURT: You're in vigorous agreement.
MR. EVERDELL: Oh, I thought we were disagreeing.
That's so rare. Yes, we're in agreement with that.
THE COURT: I don't send it back unless the parties
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016969
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document