DOJ-OGR-00013553.jpg

561 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 561 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Ms. Moe, and the judge. Ms. Moe is requesting to present exhibits to the jury in a streamlined fashion without a witness, arguing it would be more efficient. The judge questions this unusual procedure, suggesting it could be handled during closing arguments and noting its difference from other methods.

People (2)

Name Role Context
MS. MOE Attorney
Speaker in the transcript arguing for a specific method of presenting evidence to the jury.
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, addressed as 'your Honor', questioning the procedure proposed by Ms. Moe.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
government Government
Mentioned by the Court when describing a procedure for publishing documents in a trial.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A procedural discussion during a trial about how to present exhibits to the jury.
Courtroom in 'this district'

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned by Ms. Moe as the location of past trials where she has used summary witnesses.

Relationships (1)

MS. MOE Professional THE COURT
The document shows a formal dialogue between an attorney (Ms. Moe) and a judge (The Court, addressed as 'your Honor') during a legal proceeding.

Key Quotes (3)

"We'd just like an opportunity to publish these exhibits in a way that facilitates the jury seeing them without doing this through lay witnesses where there are complications about reading things out loud, so that it's streamlined and efficient so the jury can see the evidence that's been admitted."
Source
— MS. MOE (Justifying her request to the Court for an alternative method of presenting evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00013553.jpg
Quote #1
"Why not just do it in closing?"
Source
— THE COURT (Questioning Ms. Moe's proposed procedure and suggesting an alternative.)
DOJ-OGR-00013553.jpg
Quote #2
"The one thing I've seen that it sounds like you're saying is actually not with a witness, but a bunch of documents come in, and then the government spends a little bit of time just publishing, publish this and publish that."
Source
— THE COURT (Comparing Ms. Moe's request to a procedure the Court has previously observed.)
DOJ-OGR-00013553.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,393 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 49 1985
LC9VMAXT
1 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
2 I have in trials in this district called summary
3 witnesses who helped publish and connect up facts across
4 exhibits without creating summary charts under Rule 1006. I
5 think this testimony --
6 THE COURT: You're not offering him under 1006?
7 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.
8 THE COURT: And he isn't involved in the
9 investigation.
10 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.
11 We'd just like an opportunity to publish these
12 exhibits in a way that facilitates the jury seeing them without
13 doing this through lay witnesses where there are complications
14 about reading things out loud, so that it's streamlined and
15 efficient so the jury can see the evidence that's been
16 admitted. We think that's appropriate.
17 THE COURT: Why not just do it in closing?
18 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think to rest our case and
19 have the jury not see some of the evidence in this case, our
20 preference would be --
21 THE COURT: The one thing I've seen that it sounds
22 like you're saying is actually not with a witness, but a bunch
23 of documents come in, and then the government spends a little
24 bit of time just publishing, publish this and publish that.
25 Again, I've never seen -- never seen an agent, a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013553

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document