DOJ-OGR-00008220.jpg

716 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 716 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on December 4, 2021, is part of a court case where the Government argues for the admissibility of photographic evidence from a search of Epstein's house. The Government intends to use photos of the house's structural features and contents, such as a 'creepy looking' stuffed tiger, to corroborate the testimony of a witness named Jane. Jane testified that the house was 'massive' and 'intimidating,' and the photos are meant to support her claims and counter potential defense arguments about the house's decor.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Epstein
Mentioned throughout as the owner of the house being discussed, whose decorating style and possessions are central to...
Jane Witness
A witness whose testimony about Epstein's house (its features, contents, and how it made her feel) the Government see...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Government government agency
A party in the legal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing for the admissibility of evidence (photographs) to support...
The Court judicial body
Mentioned in a footnote as having previously ruled on the admissibility of other evidence (costumes) from the search.

Timeline (3 events)

2021-11-30
Jane provided testimony describing Epstein's house as 'massive' and 'intimidating' and containing 'Lots of stone, you know, old wood.'
Court
2021-12-03
The Court ruled to reserve judgment on the admissibility of costumes found during the search of Epstein's house.
Court
The Government conducted a search of Epstein's house, during which it observed and photographed items, including stuffed animals.
Epstein's house

Locations (1)

Location Context
The central location discussed, which was searched by the Government and is the subject of Jane's testimony.

Relationships (1)

Jane adversarial (witness vs. subject of investigation) Epstein
Jane provided testimony against Epstein, describing her negative experience and observations while visiting his house.

Key Quotes (5)

"creepy looking"
Source
— The Government (Used to describe a stuffed animal photographed during the search of Epstein's house.)
DOJ-OGR-00008220.jpg
Quote #1
"creepy looking animals"
Source
— Jane (Part of Jane's testimony describing what she saw in Epstein's house.)
DOJ-OGR-00008220.jpg
Quote #2
"massive"
Source
— Jane (Jane's description of Epstein's house during her testimony on 11/30/21.)
DOJ-OGR-00008220.jpg
Quote #3
"Intimidated."
Source
— Jane (How Jane testified she felt in Epstein's house.)
DOJ-OGR-00008220.jpg
Quote #4
"Lots of stone, you know, old wood."
Source
— Jane (Jane's explanation during testimony for why the house was intimidating.)
DOJ-OGR-00008220.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,081 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 523 Filed 12/04/21 Page 7 of 9
305). This comment about Epstein’s distinct decorating style may seem implausible to jurors. But the Government observed and photographed more than one stuffed animal that could fairly be described as “creepy looking” during its search of Epstein’s house, including as depicted in Government Exhibit 9384.
[Redacted]
The fact that this stuffed tiger is movable property is counterbalanced by the fact that it is highly idiosyncratic. While the Government would not argue that Epstein had this particular stuffed tiger in his home in the mid-1990s, it is probative of Jane’s testimony that—at any point in time—Epstein possessed the kind of “creepy looking animals” that she described.
Third, the Government would offer six photos—Government Exhibits 909 through 911, 913, 915, and 933—to demonstrate structural features of the house. Some of these photographs will provide context for the law enforcement officer’s testimony by showing the entrance areas of the house which she searched. And all of them will corroborate Jane’s testimony that the house was intimidating and contains significant amounts of wood and stone, as Jane stated. (11/30/21 Tr. at 317-18 (describing the house as “massive” and made her feel “Intimidated.”); 320 (explaining that the house had “Lots of stone, you know, old wood.”)). Neither of these theories involve movable property of any kind, and the Government would not argue that any movable furniture or artwork was present when Jane visited the house.5
Fourth, Epstein’s home contained a large number of photographs of celebrities, including
4 A stuffed dog is also depicted in Government Exhibit 936.
5 The Government also notes that the Court has already ruled that it will reserve, subject to connection, on the admissibility of costumes from the search, which are marked as physical exhibits and depicted in Government Exhibits 919 and 920. (12/03/21 Tr. at 929). The Government similarly will offer Government Exhibits 919 and 920 subject to connection.
7
DOJ-OGR-00008220

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document