DOJ-OGR-00014974.jpg
544 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
544 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. Mr. Pagliuca argues that under Rule 16, he should be able to examine all materials a witness, Dr. Rocchio, used to prepare her testimony. The judge challenges this broad interpretation, clarifying that only materials that form the actual basis of her opinion, not discarded notes or unrelated contracts, are relevant.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness (implied) |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a cross-examination ("Rocchio - Cross").
|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness (implied) |
Mentioned as the person to whom something was provided and whose testimony is being discussed.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney (implied) |
An individual addressing the court, arguing about the materials used for a witness's testimony.
|
| THE COURT | Judge (implied) |
The presiding official in the courtroom, responding to Mr. Pagliuca's arguments.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2025-01-15
A cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, during which a legal argument occurred between Mr. Pagliuca and the Court about the scope of discoverable materials that formed the basis of the witness's opinion.
Courtroom (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and engages in a formal legal argument during a court proceeding.
Mr. Pagliuca is conducting a cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio and is arguing with the judge about the materials related to her testimony.
Key Quotes (3)
"I believe that under Rule 16 I am allowed to examine whatever she relied on in anticipation and preparation for her testimony here today."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Arguing for his right to review the witness's preparatory materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00014974.jpg
Quote #1
"Notes that have a subject heading "grooming," for example, that she threw away which are not in the file are not a bases for her opinion."Source
— THE COURT
(Countering Mr. Pagliuca's argument by providing an example of materials that would not be considered a basis for testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00014974.jpg
Quote #2
"What is in your file that forms the basis for your opinion? That will get us to where we need to get."Source
— THE COURT
(Reframing the issue to focus on the specific materials that support the witness's opinion.)
DOJ-OGR-00014974.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,392 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 98 of 158 98
LBAAMAX3ps
Rocchio - Cross
LBAAMAX3ps
Rocchio - Cross
1 provided to Dr. Rocchio.
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Do you need a response from me, your
3 Honor?
4 THE COURT: Go ahead.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, your Honor, I understand Jencks
6 Act production, but this is a separate issue. She relied on
7 this in preparation for her testimony today, and I believe that
8 under Rule 16 I am allowed to examine whatever she relied on in
9 anticipation and preparation for her testimony here today.
10 This would be part of the bases for her opinion, your
11 Honor.
12 THE COURT: Well, I don't know if it is. Notes that
13 have a subject heading "grooming," for example, that she threw
14 away which are not in the file are not a bases for her opinion.
15 So I don't know that the whole file is subject to that theory.
16 The contract between her and the government is not a
17 basis for opinion, but you've asked for that since she's
18 included that in the file.
19 MR. PAGLIUCA: I have that, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: Right. But you see the point.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: I understand. But I don't know what is
22 in her file, is my point.
23 THE COURT: Right. Well, so then the question, I
24 think, is: What is in your file that forms the basis for your
25 opinion? That will get us to where we need to get.
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Do you need a response from me, your
3 Honor?
4 THE COURT: Go ahead.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, your Honor, I understand Jencks
6 Act production, but this is a separate issue. She relied on
7 this in preparation for her testimony today, and I believe that
8 under Rule 16 I am allowed to examine whatever she relied on in
9 anticipation and preparation for her testimony here today.
10 This would be part of the bases for her opinion, your
11 Honor.
12 THE COURT: Well, I don't know if it is. Notes that
13 have a subject heading "grooming," for example, that she threw
14 away which are not in the file are not a bases for her opinion.
15 So I don't know that the whole file is subject to that theory.
16 The contract between her and the government is not a
17 basis for opinion, but you've asked for that since she's
18 included that in the file.
19 MR. PAGLIUCA: I have that, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: Right. But you see the point.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: I understand. But I don't know what is
22 in her file, is my point.
23 THE COURT: Right. Well, so then the question, I
24 think, is: What is in your file that forms the basis for your
25 opinion? That will get us to where we need to get.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014974
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document