DOJ-OGR-00013284.jpg
557 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
557 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between attorneys and a judge about witness strategy. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, states she cannot yet confirm which witnesses her side will call, while the government's attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, flags the possibility of calling 'victim 2' later that day. The discussion highlights the fluid nature of trial proceedings and witness scheduling.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, appears to be a defense attorney discussing witness strategy.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the case and interacting with the attorneys.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, appears to be an attorney for the government, discussing witness scheduling.
|
| Jane | Potential Witness |
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as a person the defense might recall as a witness.
|
| Brian | Potential Witness |
Mentioned by The Court as a person the defense might call as a witness.
|
| victim 2 | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as a witness the government might get to by the end of the day.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| the government | Government agency |
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as the party he represents, likely the prosecution in a criminal case.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion in court between attorneys (Ms. Menninger, Mr. Rohrbach) and the judge regarding trial strategy, specifically the calling of witnesses.
Courtroom
Relationships (3)
Ms. Menninger addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and responds to the judge's questions about her legal strategy.
Mr. Rohrbach addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and provides updates on the government's case schedule.
They represent opposing sides in a legal case (implied defense vs. government) and are discussing their respective trial strategies in front of the judge.
Key Quotes (3)
"So I just, in asking you right this second, what decision we've made about our case in chief, I can't give your Honor an answer."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Responding to the judge's inquiry about witness decisions, stating that her team is still assessing who to call.)
DOJ-OGR-00013284.jpg
Quote #1
"Mr. Rohrbach, you just began by asking whether they intended to recall Jane. They don't know."Source
— THE COURT
(Summarizing the uncertainty of the defense's witness plan regarding a person named Jane.)
DOJ-OGR-00013284.jpg
Quote #2
"The other issue the government wanted to just flag for the Court is there is a possibility that we'd get to victim 2 by the end of the day today, and I know the Court has --"Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Informing the court about the potential scheduling for a witness referred to as 'victim 2'.)
DOJ-OGR-00013284.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,332 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 262 1711
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
In any event, I'm still unclear what the decision
point is. You have decisions to make as to who to call, but
you're not seeking anything --
MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. And if I were to call
her and ask her something outside of the prior consistent
statements, we would brief that to your Honor or bring that up
in advance, we would not just do that. It's just that, as your
Honor has seen, they shaved a substantial amount of their case
off and are not calling a number of witnesses that they
intended to call, and we are assessing who we need to call in
getting those people here and so forth.
So I just, in asking you right this second, what
decision we've made about our case in chief, I can't give your
Honor an answer.
THE COURT: I understand that. I don't think I was
seeking that.
Mr. Rohrbach, you just began by asking whether they
intended to recall Jane. They don't know.
MR. ROHRBACH: Right.
THE COURT: And whether they intend to call Brian,
they don't know.
MR. ROHRBACH: Thank you, your Honor.
The other issue the government wanted to just flag for
the Court is there is a possibility that we'd get to victim 2
by the end of the day today, and I know the Court has --
point is. You have decisions to make as to who to call, but
you're not seeking anything --
MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. And if I were to call
her and ask her something outside of the prior consistent
statements, we would brief that to your Honor or bring that up
in advance, we would not just do that. It's just that, as your
Honor has seen, they shaved a substantial amount of their case
off and are not calling a number of witnesses that they
intended to call, and we are assessing who we need to call in
getting those people here and so forth.
So I just, in asking you right this second, what
decision we've made about our case in chief, I can't give your
Honor an answer.
THE COURT: I understand that. I don't think I was
seeking that.
Mr. Rohrbach, you just began by asking whether they
intended to recall Jane. They don't know.
MR. ROHRBACH: Right.
THE COURT: And whether they intend to call Brian,
they don't know.
MR. ROHRBACH: Thank you, your Honor.
The other issue the government wanted to just flag for
the Court is there is a possibility that we'd get to victim 2
by the end of the day today, and I know the Court has --
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013284
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document