DOJ-OGR-00013348.jpg
570 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
570 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between an attorney, Ms. Moe, and the judge (The Court) regarding the admission of three spiral-bound message books as evidence. Ms. Moe argues that the books have been authenticated by a witness and are admissible despite hearsay objections, citing precedent from similar evidence already admitted in the trial.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Hesse | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of direct examination: "Hesse - direct".
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, addressed as "Your Honor," who is presiding over the proceedings.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript who is arguing for the admission of evidence.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (2)
Key Quotes (3)
"These three exhibits are spiral bound message books. As their appearance makes clear, no one could tear an object out or put it in there, and so they are a continuous record."Source
— MS. MOE
(Arguing for the integrity and authenticity of the message books being submitted as evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00013348.jpg
Quote #1
"I didn't hear an authentication objection. It was hearsay."Source
— THE COURT
(Clarifying that the objection raised was based on hearsay, not on the authentication of the documents.)
DOJ-OGR-00013348.jpg
Quote #2
"With respect to hearsay, these are admissible for the same reasons the other message pads are admissible and received. They are phone messages that record the date and time of a person calling."Source
— MS. MOE
(Providing the legal argument for why the message books should be admitted as evidence despite being hearsay.)
DOJ-OGR-00013348.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,420 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 70 of 262 1775
LC8Cmax3 Hesse - direct
LC8Cmax3 Hesse - direct
1 (Jury not present)
2 (Witness excused)
3 THE COURT: You may be seated. Okay.
4 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. These three exhibits
5 are spiral bound message books. As their appearance makes
6 clear, no one could tear an object out or put it in there, and
7 so they are a continuous record.
8 Your Honor, this witness has authenticated these
9 message books in the same manner that a previous witness has
10 also authenticated other message books, and they were admitted
11 exactly the same way earlier in a trial.
12 With respect to rule 901 --
13 THE COURT: I didn't hear an authentication objection.
14 It was hearsay.
15 MS. MOE: With respect to hearsay, these are
16 admissible for the same reasons the other message pads are
17 admissible and received. They are phone messages that record
18 the date and time of a person calling.
19 With respect to particular victims that are in those
20 messages, that would be a prior consistent statement to the
21 extent the witness testified.
22 Your Honor, there are already message pads that are
23 already in evidence that were not objected to on hearsay
24 grounds. So they are in the record. These are of a similar
25 nature. We are simply offering an additional set in the same
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013348
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document