DOJ-OGR-00000573.jpg
608 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
608 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on July 24, 2019, in the case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. An unidentified speaker, likely a prosecutor, argues against the defense's interpretation of a federal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the definition of the crime, emphasizing that the case involves sex trafficking of underage girls, which makes the defense's arguments about consent legally irrelevant and offensive.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by the speaker multiple times during a legal argument.
|
| defendant | Defendant |
Mentioned as having tried to 'wiggle out' of a federal NPA.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-07-24
A speaker, likely a prosecutor, is making an argument to a judge, countering points made by the defense regarding a federal NPA and the nature of the alleged sex trafficking crimes involving underage girls.
Courtroom in the Southern District of Florida
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the jurisdiction where the NPA applies.
|
Relationships (1)
prosecutor (speaker)
→
professional
→
defense
The speaker is actively arguing against points raised by the defense in a court setting, indicating an adversarial legal relationship.
Key Quotes (2)
"Quintessential sex trafficking is sex trafficking that is met by the elements of the crime which we have here."Source
— unidentified speaker (likely prosecutor)
(The speaker is defining the crime in response to the defense's characterization of it.)
DOJ-OGR-00000573.jpg
Quote #1
"It's underage girls that are involved in this case, and it's underage girls who are the victims. To say that consent is some sort of a separate issue that we should ignore is offensive, frankly, and it's not supported by the law."Source
— unidentified speaker (likely prosecutor)
(The speaker is arguing that the age of the victims makes the issue of consent irrelevant and legally unsupported.)
DOJ-OGR-00000573.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,583 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 63 of 74 63
1 districts were aware of it, which there is no evidence that
2 they were. The approval of jurisdiction to contemplate federal
3 charges and a federal NPA, as the defendant tried to wiggle out
4 of this agreement after it had been signed, is different from
5 having the NPA apply outside of the Southern District of
6 Florida which it does not.
7 What they're describing is a normal appeal process,
8 and there is an entirely separate process for getting coverage
9 outside of the relevant district, and what they're describing
10 ain't it. It didn't happen here.
11 Your Honor, the defense has kept coming back to this
12 idea of 1591 being enslavement, of pimping people out, of
13 people servicing individuals 15 to 20 times a day as they
14 mentioned in one of its submissions. Quintessential sex
15 trafficking is sex trafficking that is met by the elements of
16 the crime which we have here.
17 The defense said we don't have consent here or putting
18 the issue of consent aside. Your Honor, it's underage girls.
19 It's underage girls that are involved in this case, and it's
20 underage girls who are the victims. To say that consent is
21 some sort of a separate issue that we should ignore is
22 offensive, frankly, and it's not supported by the law.
23 Moving along, with respect to compliance following a
24 prior conviction rebutting the presumption, it's easy to figure
25 out why that's not the case, your Honor. I'll explain why.
2 they were. The approval of jurisdiction to contemplate federal
3 charges and a federal NPA, as the defendant tried to wiggle out
4 of this agreement after it had been signed, is different from
5 having the NPA apply outside of the Southern District of
6 Florida which it does not.
7 What they're describing is a normal appeal process,
8 and there is an entirely separate process for getting coverage
9 outside of the relevant district, and what they're describing
10 ain't it. It didn't happen here.
11 Your Honor, the defense has kept coming back to this
12 idea of 1591 being enslavement, of pimping people out, of
13 people servicing individuals 15 to 20 times a day as they
14 mentioned in one of its submissions. Quintessential sex
15 trafficking is sex trafficking that is met by the elements of
16 the crime which we have here.
17 The defense said we don't have consent here or putting
18 the issue of consent aside. Your Honor, it's underage girls.
19 It's underage girls that are involved in this case, and it's
20 underage girls who are the victims. To say that consent is
21 some sort of a separate issue that we should ignore is
22 offensive, frankly, and it's not supported by the law.
23 Moving along, with respect to compliance following a
24 prior conviction rebutting the presumption, it's easy to figure
25 out why that's not the case, your Honor. I'll explain why.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000573
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document