DOJ-OGR-00008583.jpg

681 KB

Extraction Summary

0
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 681 KB
Summary

This document is a jury instruction (No. 33) from a federal criminal case, filed on December 18, 2021. It defines the first element of conspiracy to violate federal law, explaining that it is an agreement between two or more people to commit an unlawful act, which can be proven through explicit or implicit understanding rather than requiring direct evidence of a formal pact.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
the Government government agency
Mentioned as the party that must sustain the burden of proof to show a conspiracy existed.

Key Quotes (3)

"A conspiracy is an agreement or an understanding, between two or more persons, to accomplish by joint action a criminal or unlawful purpose."
Source
— The Court (in jury instructions) (Defining the term 'conspiracy' as the first element of the crime.)
DOJ-OGR-00008583.jpg
Quote #1
"The essence of the crime of conspiracy is the unlawful agreement between two or more people to violate the law."
Source
— The Court (in jury instructions) (Stating the core concept of the crime of conspiracy.)
DOJ-OGR-00008583.jpg
Quote #2
"It is rare that a conspiracy can be proven by direct evidence of an explicit agreement."
Source
— The Court (in jury instructions) (Explaining that conspiracies are often proven through indirect or circumstantial evidence rather than a formal, documented agreement.)
DOJ-OGR-00008583.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,966 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 563 Filed 12/18/21 Page 45 of 167
Instruction No. 33: Counts One, Three, and Five: Conspiracy to Violate Federal Law – First Element
Starting with the first element, what is a conspiracy? A conspiracy is an agreement or an understanding, between two or more persons, to accomplish by joint action a criminal or unlawful purpose.
The essence of the crime of conspiracy is the unlawful agreement between two or more people to violate the law. As I mentioned earlier, the ultimate success of the conspiracy, meaning the actual commission of the crime that is the object of the conspiracy, is not an element of the crime of conspiracy.
In order to show that a conspiracy existed, the evidence must show that two or more people, in some way or manner, through any contrivance, explicitly or implicitly (that is, spoken or unspoken), came to a mutual understanding to violate the law and to accomplish an unlawful plan. Express language or specific words are not required to indicate assent or attachment to a conspiracy. If you find beyond a reasonable doubt that two or more persons came to an understanding, express or implied, to violate the law and to accomplish an unlawful plan, then the Government will have sustained its burden of proof as to this element.
To show that a conspiracy existed, the Government is not required to show that two or more people sat around a table and entered into a solemn pact, orally or in writing, stating that they had formed a conspiracy to violate the law and spelling out all of the details. Common sense tells you that when people, in fact, agree to enter into a criminal conspiracy, much is left to the unexpressed understanding. It is rare that a conspiracy can be proven by direct evidence of an explicit agreement. Conspirators do not usually reduce their agreements to writing or acknowledge them before a notary public, nor do they publicly broadcast their plans.
44
DOJ-OGR-00008583

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document