EFTA00027382.pdf

71.6 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread
File Size: 71.6 KB
Summary

This document is an email thread between Assistant United States Attorneys (USANYS) dated April 11-13, 2021. The discussion concerns locating a comprehensive set of Jeffrey Epstein documents from the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) without a 'translucent green watermark' for potential production to the Court. The attorneys confirm that BOP previously emailed them PDFs of these documents, which were then produced to defense counsel.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Nick Recipient
Addressed in the initial email regarding the document request.
Redacted Senders/Recipients Assistant United States Attorneys (USANYS)
Employees of the US Attorney's Office discussing the handling and production of Epstein documents.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USANYS
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), employer of email participants.
BOP
Bureau of Prisons, the source of the Epstein documents.
The Court
Judicial body potentially requiring production of non-watermarked documents.

Locations (2)

Location Context
Office location for the attorneys.
Address listed in the email signature of one of the attorneys.

Relationships (1)

USANYS Staff Data Request BOP
USANYS requested and received Epstein documents from the Bureau of Prisons via email.

Key Quotes (4)

"I recall that at some point you requested a version of the Epstein FOIA documents from BOP without the translucent green watermark they put on the withheld documents."
Source
EFTA00027382.pdf
Quote #1
"Although the Court has not put in a specific order yet, I think it's likely that we'll need to produce documents without the translucent green marking to the Court."
Source
EFTA00027382.pdf
Quote #2
"We requested these from the BOP, and they provided a set of documents, which we then produced to defense counsel."
Source
EFTA00027382.pdf
Quote #3
"They emailed us PDFs."
Source
EFTA00027382.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,365 characters)

From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Documents from BOP without Green Watermark
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 20:39:44 +0000
Thanks.
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 4:39 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: Epstein Documents from BOP without Green Watermark
They emailed us PDFs.
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
On Apr 13, 2021, at 4:35 PM, [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Thanks again for this, [REDACTED], and we can talk some more about it tomorrow. In the meantime, can I ask how BOP provided the docs to you? Do you have JEFS access? Or did they email them?
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 11:36 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Documents from BOP without Green Watermark
Hi [REDACTED],
We requested these from the BOP, and they provided a set of documents, which we then produced to defense counsel. We did not do a page by page comparison between the redacted set and the unredacted set, so we can't guarantee that they are "comprehensive." But we can provide you with what we have, assuming that there aren't any issues with us sharing in that way.
Best,
[REDACTED]
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2021 12:27 PM
EFTA00027382
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Epstein Documents from BOP without Green Watermark
Nick and [REDACTED],
I recall that at some point you requested a version of the Epstein FOIA documents from BOP without the translucent green watermark they put on the withheld documents. Do you have those saved down somewhere? Although the Court has not put in a specific order yet, I think it's likely that we'll need to produce documents without the translucent green marking to the Court. I have versions without the watermark for some of the docs, but it looks like not all. Do you have a comprehensive set somewhere?
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
300 Quarropas Street
White Plains, NY 10601
Telephone: [REDACTED]
EFTA00027383

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document