DOJ-OGR-00016468.jpg
547 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
547 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between the judge, defense attorney Mr. Everdell, and government attorney Ms. Moe regarding the scheduling of witness list disclosures and related legal submissions. The parties agree on a timeline for actions on the following Monday, Wednesday, and Thursday, with Mr. Everdell highlighting the witnesses' need for a prompt resolution.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney |
Speaking on behalf of the defense, discussing scheduling for witness list disclosure and submissions with the court.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
Speaking, likely for the government, to discuss scheduling matters with the court.
|
| The Judge | Judge |
Referred to as "Your Honor" and "THE COURT", presiding over the hearing and making decisions on scheduling.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | government agency |
The judicial body presiding over the case, interacting with the attorneys.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings, listed in the footer.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A court proceeding to discuss and set deadlines for the disclosure of a witness list and subsequent legal submissions.
Courtroom in the Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the footer via the court reporting agency's name, indicating the jurisdiction of the court.
|
Relationships (3)
Mr. Everdell addresses the judge as "Your Honor" and makes procedural suggestions for the court's consideration.
Ms. Moe addresses the judge as "Your Honor" and discusses scheduling.
They appear to be opposing counsel, representing the "defense" and the "government" respectively, negotiating a schedule through the court.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think it makes the most sense to do this after we have disclosed the witness list and then we can confer."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Proposing a sequence of actions to the court regarding the witness list.)
DOJ-OGR-00016468.jpg
Quote #1
"I think if we can do it by Monday, that would be fine for the defense, if that works for the government."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Suggesting a deadline for a submission.)
DOJ-OGR-00016468.jpg
Quote #2
"I think the concern is high enough among some of these witnesses that -- you know, that they need an answer on this issue sooner"Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Expressing urgency for a decision due to witness concerns.)
DOJ-OGR-00016468.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,301 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 252 of 267
LCAVMAX8
LCAVMAX8
talking about.
MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, if I can make a suggestion,
I think it makes the most sense to do this after we have
disclosed the witness list and then we can confer.
I think it makes the most sense to do this after we have
disclosed the witness list and then we can confer.
THE COURT: Right. So do that. And then confer and
then you tell me, Mr. Everdell, when would you like to put
in --
then you tell me, Mr. Everdell, when would you like to put
in --
MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.
I think if we can do it by Monday, that would be fine
for the defense, if that works for the government.
I think if we can do it by Monday, that would be fine
for the defense, if that works for the government.
THE COURT: So Monday. If you're in agreement, you'll
put in a submission. If you're in disagreement, the defense
will move on Monday and I'll hear from the government on --
put in a submission. If you're in disagreement, the defense
will move on Monday and I'll hear from the government on --
MS. MOE: Wednesday, your Honor?
THE COURT: So I suppose we might be looking at this
application with respect to witnesses on Thursday.
application with respect to witnesses on Thursday.
MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
If I could just have one moment to confer on timing.
If I could just have one moment to confer on timing.
THE COURT: Yes.
MS. MOE: Your Honor, would Wednesday at noon be
acceptable? If the Court would like additional time --
acceptable? If the Court would like additional time --
THE COURT: That's fine.
MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I'm sorry to do this, but I
think the concern is high enough among some of these witnesses
that -- you know, that they need an answer on this issue sooner
think the concern is high enough among some of these witnesses
that -- you know, that they need an answer on this issue sooner
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016468
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document