This document is page 59 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text captures a legal argument regarding jury instructions, specifically concerning 'overt acts' and the testimony of a witness named 'Kate.' The defense (Everdell and Sternheim) and prosecution (Rohrbach) are present, and the Judge calls for a 10-minute recess following a request by Ms. Sternheim to consult with Mr. Everdell.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Discussing jury instructions regarding overt acts and witness testimony; asks for a break.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion; grants a 10-minute break.
|
| Kate | Witness |
Mentioned in relation to jury instructions: 'they can't convict solely on the basis of Kate's testimony.'
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Prosecutor |
Agreeing with the Court and Everdell regarding the indictment context.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Asks the judge for a moment to speak with Mr. Everdell.
|
| The Law Clerk | Court Staff |
Announces 'All rise' before the recess.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.
|
"I do think it's important to instruct the jury here that they can't convict solely on the basis of Kate's testimony."Source
"Right, because it's not just about what's in the indictment."Source
"Judge, may I just have one moment with Mr. Everdell?"Source
"Actually, why don't we take a 10-minute break."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (791 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document