DOJ-OGR-00014702.jpg
628 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
628 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal discussion regarding jury deliberations, specifically concerning whether Ghislaine Maxwell arranged flights to or from New Mexico for a person named 'Jane' for the purpose of illegal sexual activity. Attorney Ms. Moe argues that a note from the jury is confusing and that the parties are guessing at the jury's hypothetical questions regarding Count Four.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of discussion regarding conviction on specific counts related to travel arrangements.
|
| Jane | Victim/Subject |
Individual whose travel to New Mexico is being scrutinized for intent of sexual activity.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
Speaker addressing the court regarding a jury note.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressee of Ms. Moe's statement.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of travel (flights in and out) being discussed as evidence.
|
Relationships (1)
Discussion regarding whether Maxwell arranged Jane's flights for illegal sexual activity.
Key Quotes (4)
"Because there is no, I think, evidence that she arranged the flight going to New Mexico; instead, they are considering now whether there's any evidence that she may have arranged the flight out of New Mexico."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014702.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm sorry, Count Four I should have said, not Count Two."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014702.jpg
Quote #2
"That's not travel for the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014702.jpg
Quote #3
"We are now guessing at what hypothetical facts the jury is talking about; and then guessing hypothetically what their legal question is on top of that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014702.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,649 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 29 3133
LCRVMAXT
LCRVMAXT
1 to New Mexico, where/if there was an intent for Jane to engage
2 in sexual activity. So there is still an open question in
3 their minds about whether the flight to New Mexico, that
4 travel, was for the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual
5 activity.
6 But they are now considering whether the flight out of
7 New Mexico, if Ms. Maxwell had any -- did anything to do with
8 that flight, with arranging that flight, could we convict her
9 on that count alone. Because there is no, I think, evidence
10 that she arranged the flight going to New Mexico; instead, they
11 are considering now whether there's any evidence that she may
12 have arranged the flight out of New Mexico. And is that enough
13 to provide a conviction on Count Two? And I think the answer
14 to that is pretty clearly no -- I'm sorry, Count Four I should
15 have said, not Count Two. Because there's no evidence of that.
16 And there is also -- there is no -- in the instructions
17 instructions themselves, that would not be a significant or
18 motivating purpose for that travel across state lines. That
19 would simply be for her to return home. That's not travel for
20 the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity.
21 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think this colloquy
22 illustrates how confusing the note is. We are now guessing at
23 what hypothetical facts the jury is talking about; and then
24 guessing hypothetically what their legal question is on top of
25 that. And I think we're compounding guesswork, what this
2 in sexual activity. So there is still an open question in
3 their minds about whether the flight to New Mexico, that
4 travel, was for the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual
5 activity.
6 But they are now considering whether the flight out of
7 New Mexico, if Ms. Maxwell had any -- did anything to do with
8 that flight, with arranging that flight, could we convict her
9 on that count alone. Because there is no, I think, evidence
10 that she arranged the flight going to New Mexico; instead, they
11 are considering now whether there's any evidence that she may
12 have arranged the flight out of New Mexico. And is that enough
13 to provide a conviction on Count Two? And I think the answer
14 to that is pretty clearly no -- I'm sorry, Count Four I should
15 have said, not Count Two. Because there's no evidence of that.
16 And there is also -- there is no -- in the instructions
17 instructions themselves, that would not be a significant or
18 motivating purpose for that travel across state lines. That
19 would simply be for her to return home. That's not travel for
20 the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity.
21 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think this colloquy
22 illustrates how confusing the note is. We are now guessing at
23 what hypothetical facts the jury is talking about; and then
24 guessing hypothetically what their legal question is on top of
25 that. And I think we're compounding guesswork, what this
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014702
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document