DOJ-OGR-00021826.jpg
356 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
356 KB
Summary
This document is the table of contents for a legal brief filed in Case 22-1426 on November 1, 2024. The central issue outlined is whether an 'en banc review' is necessary to reconsider 'Annabi's canon of construction' as it applies to plea agreements. The document structures the legal argument, including sections on background, a prior panel decision, and the main argument for review.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Annabi |
Mentioned in the argument section heading: 'WHETHER ANNABI’S CANON OF CONSTRUCTION FOR PLEA AGREEMENTS SHOULD BE OVER...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ-OGR | Government agency |
Appears in the footer of the document as part of a Bates number 'DOJ-OGR-00021826', likely indicating the Department ...
|
Timeline (1 events)
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,191 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 117, 11/01/2024, 3636586, Page2 of 51
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................................... ii
INTRODUCTION AND RULE 35(B)(1) STATEMENT .................................................... 1
ISSUE PRESENTED........................................................................................................... 3
BACKGROUND....................................................................................................... 3
PANEL DECISION................................................................................................... 5
ARGUMENT ....................................................................................................................... 7
EN BANC REVIEW IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE
WHETHER ANNABI’S CANON OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
PLEA AGREEMENTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED OR
LIMITED................................................................................................................ 7
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 16
INTRODUCTION AND RULE 35(B)(1) STATEMENT .................................................... 1
ISSUE PRESENTED........................................................................................................... 3
BACKGROUND....................................................................................................... 3
PANEL DECISION................................................................................................... 5
ARGUMENT ....................................................................................................................... 7
EN BANC REVIEW IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE
WHETHER ANNABI’S CANON OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
PLEA AGREEMENTS SHOULD BE OVERRULED OR
LIMITED................................................................................................................ 7
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 16
i
DOJ-OGR-00021826
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document