DOJ-OGR-00013533.jpg
597 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
597 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a conversation between the judge (THE COURT), Ms. Moe (likely prosecution), and Mr. Everdell (defense counsel) about scheduling the remainder of the trial. They discuss when the government's case will conclude, the defense's intention to call witnesses, and potential dates for a charge conference, specifically the evening of the 16th or Saturday the 18th.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Counsel |
Speaks to the Court (Your Honor) to provide an update on the timing of the case.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Counsel |
Speaks to the Court (Your Honor) on behalf of the defense, discussing witnesses and scheduling for a charge conference.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, asking questions about scheduling and proposing dates for a charge conference.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
A discussion about case timing and scheduling after the jury was dismissed for the evening.
Courtroom
A proposed charge conference to be held either on the evening of the 16th or on Saturday the 18th.
Courtroom
Relationships (3)
Ms. Moe addresses the Court as 'Your Honor' and provides a procedural update, indicating a formal counsel-judge relationship.
Mr. Everdell addresses the Court as 'Your Honor' and discusses the defense's case and scheduling, indicating a formal counsel-judge relationship.
They are opposing counsel in a legal case. The Court asks Mr. Everdell about the defense case immediately after Ms. Moe discusses when the government's case will rest.
Key Quotes (4)
"Your Honor, we just wanted to provide the Court with an update on timing. We anticipate that we may rest tomorrow or, if things run long, on Friday morning."Source
— MS. MOE
(Informing the court about the expected conclusion of their case presentation.)
DOJ-OGR-00013533.jpg
Quote #1
"Does the defense anticipate moving to a defense case after the close of the government's case?"Source
— THE COURT
(Asking the defense about their plans following the prosecution's case.)
DOJ-OGR-00013533.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, we do have witnesses."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Confirming that the defense intends to present a case with witnesses.)
DOJ-OGR-00013533.jpg
Quote #3
"So my thinking had been the charge conference either the evening of the 16th or, if the parties were interested in taking me up on Saturday the 18th."Source
— THE COURT
(Proposing potential dates and times for the charge conference.)
DOJ-OGR-00013533.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,700 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 255 of 262 1966
LC8VMAX8
LC8VMAX8
1 Have a great evening. We'll see you tomorrow.
2 (Jury not present)
3 THE COURT: Everyone may be seated.
4 Okay. Matters to take up?
5 MS. MOE: Your Honor, we just wanted to provide the
6 Court with an update on timing. We anticipate that we may rest
7 tomorrow or, if things run long, on Friday morning.
8 THE COURT: Okay. Does the defense anticipate moving
9 to a defense case after the close of the government's case?
10 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we do have witnesses. I
11 think we haven't had the chance to confer with the government
12 yet, but I think it might make sense, especially if we finish
13 on Thursday potentially, to have the charge conference on
14 Friday so we can have time to fully address it.
15 THE COURT: I'll need you to pull up the mic.
16 MR. EVERDELL: We will likely have an application at
17 the end of the government's case, as is typical for the
18 defense. And we'd want the chance to be heard on that as well.
19 THE COURT: So my thinking had been the charge
20 conference either the evening of the 16th or, if the parties
21 were interested in taking me up on Saturday the 18th. So I
22 suppose it depends if you're saying there is -- you won't be --
23 well, I would prefer, given just timing of when I'm going to be
24 able to get you the charge, to not do it Friday, unless you
25 don't have a case to put on on Friday.
2 (Jury not present)
3 THE COURT: Everyone may be seated.
4 Okay. Matters to take up?
5 MS. MOE: Your Honor, we just wanted to provide the
6 Court with an update on timing. We anticipate that we may rest
7 tomorrow or, if things run long, on Friday morning.
8 THE COURT: Okay. Does the defense anticipate moving
9 to a defense case after the close of the government's case?
10 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we do have witnesses. I
11 think we haven't had the chance to confer with the government
12 yet, but I think it might make sense, especially if we finish
13 on Thursday potentially, to have the charge conference on
14 Friday so we can have time to fully address it.
15 THE COURT: I'll need you to pull up the mic.
16 MR. EVERDELL: We will likely have an application at
17 the end of the government's case, as is typical for the
18 defense. And we'd want the chance to be heard on that as well.
19 THE COURT: So my thinking had been the charge
20 conference either the evening of the 16th or, if the parties
21 were interested in taking me up on Saturday the 18th. So I
22 suppose it depends if you're saying there is -- you won't be --
23 well, I would prefer, given just timing of when I'm going to be
24 able to get you the charge, to not do it Friday, unless you
25 don't have a case to put on on Friday.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013533
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document