DOJ-OGR-00018126.jpg

586 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 586 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from a trial on August 10, 2022, identified as Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a dialogue between an attorney, Ms. Moe, and the judge regarding the admission of evidence, which is revealed to be photographs of costumes. The judge rules the evidence is relevant but reserves a final decision on its admission pending connecting testimony from a future witness.

People (2)

Name Role Context
MS. MOE Attorney
Speaking to the court on behalf of a party, arguing for the admission of evidence.
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the trial, making rulings on the admissibility of evidence.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion during a trial regarding the admission of evidence, specifically photographs of costumes. The court rules on its relevance but reserves a decision on the timing of its admission.
Courtroom (implied)

Relationships (1)

MS. MOE Professional THE COURT
Ms. Moe addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and they are engaged in a formal legal argument during a trial proceeding.

Key Quotes (2)

"So for the reasons that I permitted testimony similar, I concluded it was relevant and not outweighed by prejudice. That's my point, is consistency. I think for the timeframe issue, I'll reserve subject to connection."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge explaining the ruling on the relevance of the evidence while reserving judgment on the timing aspect pending further testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00018126.jpg
Quote #1
"Yes, your Honor. There are photographs of those costumes. Because they are folded, we are also offering"
Source
— MS. MOE (Confirming to the judge that the evidence in question consists of photographs of costumes.)
DOJ-OGR-00018126.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,690 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 25 of 236 929
LBUCmaxl
1 occur at this trial.
2 So our view is that it should be admitted now,
3 regardless of future witness testimony based on the record to
4 date and the arguments from the defense about what was going
5 on, the age of the victims, and whether anyone was interested
6 in underage girls.
7 So we would ask the Court to admit this evidence now,
8 but if the Court's ruling is dependent upon the prospective
9 testimony of a witness, we would have no objection to offering
10 it subject to connection or the Court reserving on that issue.
11 THE COURT: So for the reasons that I permitted
12 testimony similar, I concluded it was relevant and not
13 outweighed by prejudice. That's my point, is consistency. I
14 think for the timeframe issue, I'll reserve subject to
15 connection.
16 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Just so I understand how
17 to navigate that issue with this witness, would the Court's
18 preference be -- I'm just thinking about the mechanics of this
19 in terms of what's coming out before the jury to lay the
20 foundation for this before the Court reserves, being mindful
21 that the Court is reserving on this issue.
22 THE COURT: This is coming in through photographs, I
23 presume?
24 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. There are photographs of
25 those costumes. Because they are folded, we are also offering
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018126

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document